The episode opens with pre-roll ad reads for Plan B emergency contraception and Mint Mobile's $15/month unlimited wireless offer before the host steps in with a gripping cold open. In a few sparse sentences, the scenario is laid bare: a 15-year-old girl, alone on a bicycle in the dark, heading to an early morning job she would never reach. The case would sit unsolved for the better part of two decades. And when it finally broke open, the key wasn't a detective's breakthrough or a forensic miracle — it was a lie. The host introduces this as the story of Nicole van den Hurk and frames the episode as both heartbreaking and extraordinary.

The host delivers a personal, enthusiastic read for Jones Road Beauty, describing her own experience with the brand's Miracle Balm — a multitasking product that functions as highlighter, bronzer, blush, and lip tint, delivering a glowy look in under 60 seconds. She highlights the clean, skin-loving ingredient list (ceramides, squalene, sodium hyaluronate) and the newly launched dermatologist-tested foundation stick. The segment closes with a direct call to action: use code KMK at JonesRoadBeauty.com for a free gift on your first purchase, and let them know you came from the show.

Nicole was born on July 4, 1980 in the small German city of Erkenlenz as Nicole Tettmeyer. Her mother Angelika raised her alone before meeting Dutchman Ad van den Hurk; when Nicole was three, the family crossed into the Netherlands, and after Ad and Angelika's marriage, Nicole took the Van den Hurk surname. But Angelika struggled deeply with her mental health — withdrawing for hours at a time — creating a distance that defined their relationship. When Ad and Angelika divorced in 1989, Ad won custody, and though his career in music kept him away for long hours, his mother stepped in as a near-constant presence. Nicole and stepbrother Andy spent whole days and nights at their grandmother's house in Tongelra, Eindhoven — and over time, that house became Nicole's anchor in a life full of instability. Ad later married Yolanda, who got on well with the children, but between two working parents, their grandmother continued to carry the load.

The death of Angelika in April 1995 shattered any remaining hope Nicole had of repairing her relationship with her mother. The distance created by mental illness and custody arrangements had already been enormous; now it became permanent. By fall 1995, 15-year-old Nicole had settled into her grandmother's house with Andy and was building an outward life — staying busy with school, a part-time job, friends, and a boyfriend. She was moving fast and filling space with connection wherever she could find it. But shortly before her disappearance, Nicole confided to her aunt that an unknown man had followed and harassed her while she was walking home — a warning sign that nothing was done about at the time.

Shortly after 5 a.m. on October 6, 1995, Nicole mounted her bicycle at her grandmother's house and set off for an early shift at Woensel Shopping Centre in Eindhoven — the same route she always took. She never showed up. When coworkers raised the alarm, police began searching immediately, and that evening her bicycle was pulled from the Damel River, fully submerged. For 11 straight days — October 6 through October 17 — search teams worked the Dommel River and surrounding forests grid by grid. A national TV program called Deadline mobilised its own coordinated search with dogs, focusing repeatedly on the Vosvenpot area. They found nothing. Then on October 19, Nicole's small backpack turned up on land between the DAF complex and a canal — miles from the bicycle — a spread that made it clear this was no accident.

As the weeks wore on, the tip count hit roughly 300 by November 20 — and not one pointed to a clear suspect. An anonymous caller phoned police on October 24 claiming he could name Nicole's killer, then the line went dead; the recording was broadcast on national TV in January 1996, but nobody came forward. In February 1996, a friend of the family arrested on drug charges tried to point the finger at specific men, claiming they were behind both the drug smuggling and Nicole's murder — a story that fell apart completely under police scrutiny. A magazine offered a cash reward, pulling in more tips, none of them strong enough for prosecution. The investigative team shrank, new detectives took over, and the case settled into a limbo that families of murder victims know all too well: technically open, barely active.

On November 22, 1995, a passerby stumbled upon something hidden beneath a pile of branches and pruning waste in a stretch of woodland between Meerlo and Lierop — roughly 10 kilometres east of Nicole's grandmother's house. The concealment was deliberate and deliberate — someone had taken time and care to cover her, far from every searched zone. After seven weeks of rain, temperature swings, insects, and bacteria, forensic investigators faced a race against decomposition. They collected what they could: clothing traces, hair evidence, and three DNA samples — two from her genital area, one from her underwear — all flagged as fragile and potentially contaminated, but preserved nonetheless. The autopsy was unambiguous: Nicole had died from internal bleeding caused by a stab wound. Her jaw was fractured, her head and fingers injured — the finger wounds suggesting she had fought back. Investigators also documented evidence of sexual assault, but made a deliberate decision to keep that finding from the public. Nicole was buried on November 28, 1995.

By summer 1996, investigators had come up completely empty and turned to the people closest to Nicole. They arrested both Ad van den Hurk and his son Andy, holding each for five days — the same length of time, as it would turn out, they would later hold Andy again. Neither arrest produced a single charge, and not one piece of forensic evidence connected either man to the murder. But the damage was already done. Reports focused on family structure — Ad wasn't Nicole's biological father, only her legal guardian — and while both men walked out of custody cleared, suspicion settled on the family like a stain that the courts couldn't wash away. In a tight community, with a case this public, the whispers didn't follow the same rules as the evidence. The family that had been grieving Nicole was now having to defend itself. Then years of silence followed, the investigative team continued to shrink, and in 2004 a cold case review came and went, leaving everything exactly where it had been.

By 2011, sixteen years had passed, the case had been dormant since the failed 2004 review, and Andy van den Hurk had moved to England. Then, in a move that no one around him understood, he posted a public confession to Nicole's murder on Facebook. Law enforcement in England responded immediately, arrested him, and on March 30, 2011, he was extradited back to the Netherlands. Dutch authorities held him for five days — the exact same duration as his 1996 detention — then released him when no forensic evidence could support the confession. Andy immediately retracted it, said he hadn't done it after all, and then accused his own father Ad. It made no logical sense — a man confessing to a murder, retracting it, and pointing at the man who raised them both with zero evidence. But it was all by design. Andy understood something most people didn't: a murder confession forces exhumation, exhumation allows modern DNA testing, and modern testing might finally name the killer. He knew a false confession came with no safety net — the system could have convicted him. But to him, another decade of silence while the real killer walked free was worse. He wouldn't publicly explain his true motive until 2016 — five full years of letting people believe what they wanted about him.

Andy's gamble worked. In September 2011, Nicole's remains were exhumed and delivered to the Netherlands Forensic Institute for analysis using forensic DNA technology that simply hadn't existed when she was first found. Samples dismissed as borderline useless in 1995 — degraded by seven weeks of outdoor exposure — could now yield identifiable profiles. Three emerged: her boyfriend at the time she disappeared (expected given their relationship), convicted rapist Jos de Gee (whose DNA appeared in sperm traces and pubic hair), and an unknown third male who would never be identified. Authorities also publicly confirmed for the first time that Nicole had been sexually assaulted — a detail documented internally in 1995 but kept from the public until now. The reward was bumped to €15,000, over 20 new leads came in within a week, and the case had its first real momentum in nearly two decades.

The host draws a personal parallel between launching her own channel and the fear of starting something new, using it as a natural bridge to Shopify. She highlights the platform's 24/7 support, hundreds of ready-to-use templates, and the high-converting Shop Pay checkout button. The segment closes with a direct call to action: sign up for the $1/month trial at shopify.com/cccm.

Jos de Gee was 46 years old and living in a shelter home just six weeks from the end of his supervised reintegration when police arrested him in January 2014. He was from Valkenswaard, a town right on Eindhoven's doorstep, and had been in his late twenties when Nicole disappeared. His criminal history was extensive: the earliest known offence dated to 1987, and he had accumulated three rape convictions, including for violently assaulting his own ex-girlfriend. In September 2000, he had attacked a 20-year-old woman in Valkenswaard — pulling her from her bicycle and sexually assaulting her in an isolated location — a method that cold case investigators immediately recognised as a near-identical echo of Nicole's disappearance. A formal psychiatric evaluation had described him as 'a vessel overflowing with hate' and explicitly warned of significant reoffending risk if his underlying issues went untreated. Despite all of that, the system had him six weeks from living unsupervised.

Prosecutors formally charged Jos de Gee with rape and murder in April 2014, but by July 3 the murder charge had been downgraded to manslaughter after forensic evidence fell short — a reduction Nicole's family called a betrayal of justice. At trial in Den Bosch, de Gee's defense attorney Jaap Knuster built a case around strategic vagueness: first claiming de Gee had never crossed paths with Nicole, then pivoting to a claim that the two might have had consensual contact in the days before her death — a claim prosecutors dismissed outright given Nicole was 15 and de Gee was in his late twenties. The defense also pointed to the presence of other males' DNA and outrageously floated the claim that Nicole may have been pregnant when killed — with no basis. The real battleground was the DNA itself: the partial nature of the match meant the defense had an opening, and experts from the NFI and IFS couldn't agree on what the evidence proved. The samples were sent to New Zealand for probabilistic genotyping — a first for Dutch courts — and the result, presented in April 2016, was 2.28 million to 1 in favour of de Gee's DNA being present. Two psychiatric institution inmates also came forward separately saying de Gee had told them he killed a girl, but their testimony was ultimately kept out of formal evidence.

On November 21, 2016, the verdict arrived: guilty of rape, sentenced to 5 years — but acquitted of manslaughter. The court's reasoning was stark: because it couldn't rule out that the unidentified third DNA contributor had played some role in Nicole's death, the link between de Gee and the killing couldn't be established beyond reasonable doubt. Every other defense argument was rejected — the consensual contact story was thrown out, the promiscuity defence dismissed, and de Gee's sperm on Nicole's body was found to indicate assault, not consent. But none of it was enough to convict him of her death. With two years already served in pretrial custody, he faced roughly three more. Nicole's stepmother Yolanda shouted from the courtroom. Her stepfather Ad told regional TV that de Gee was 'not a man but a terrible creature.' The prosecution filed an appeal within 8 days. The defense filed its own, contesting even the rape conviction.