Freakonomics Radio

Podbit · Freakonomics Radio

678. Who Gets to Choose a “Good Death”?

Explore episode Jun 19, 2026

Where this was said

Al Roth on Repugnant Transactions and the Economics of MAID

At 9:31 · chapter starts 5:40

Dubner pivots from the emotional story of Kahneman to a more analytical frame, introducing Al Roth as perhaps the world's leading authority on repugnant transactions — his term for market exchanges that some people want but others morally oppose, even if they can't tell whether the transaction has occurred. Roth's new book, 'Moral Economics,' dedicates a chapter to the growing acceptance of assisted dying. The conversation first detours through kidney exchange — Roth's signature contribution, which has helped save thousands of lives by matching donors and recipients without cash — to establish his credibility in designing markets where standard pricing mechanisms are socially unacceptable. Roth then defines repugnant transactions and places MAID in historical company with same-sex marriage and interracial marriage, both once banned and now legal. The framing is dispassionate but clarifying: whether a transaction is repugnant is a social fact, not a permanent moral verdict. Roth notes that markets need social support to function, and that his job as a market designer is to understand that social landscape — not just the economics — before intervening.

Society & Culture
Al Roth: Repugnant Transactions and Assisted Dying

678. Who Gets to Choose a “Good Death”? · Jun 19, 2026 Society & Culture

Al Roth's concept of 'repugnant transactions' — things some people want and others oppose on moral grounds, regardless of harm — puts assisted dying in the same historical bucket as same-sex marriage and interracial marriage. Social support, Roth argues, is what makes or breaks any contested market.

Similar podbits

Government
The AI Race to Govern Itself: Multi-Stakeholder or Bust

Using AI to Increase Your Intelligence & Enrich Humanity | … · Aug 10, 2026 Government

Fei-Fei Li went back to Stanford from Google in 2018 specifically to build a multi-stakeholder governance framework for AI. Her argument: market forces are not societal norms. Just as biology uses IRBs and cars have safety laws, AI needs layered oversight from educators, governments, and the public — not just a few industry titans.

Government
Surveillance vs. Privacy: The Fulcrum We Need to Find

The Surveillance Economy, and How Capitalism Can Fix Poverty · Aug 10, 2026 Government

Mass surveillance is here to stay. The real battle isn't stopping cameras — it's ensuring judges and laws keep that data out of family court and civil disputes, admitting it only for violent crimes and national security. The surveillance economy currently yields more upside than downside, but only if we build the legal guardrails now.

Government
Northern Europe Isn't Socialist — It's Capitalism Done Right

The Surveillance Economy, and How Capitalism Can Fix Poverty · Aug 10, 2026 Government

When people cite Scandinavia as proof socialism works, Galloway says they've got it backwards. Northern Europe runs highly competitive free-market economies with more competition in many sectors than the US — they just make sure taxes are actually paid and redistributed. Billionaires and universal healthcare can coexist.

Government
How to Fix the UK in Four Moves

“We’re At The Beginning Of A Revolution” - Jimmy Carr - #11… · Aug 10, 2026 Government

Two percent adjustments to income tax and stamp duty tweaks are deck-chair rearrangements. The UK's competitiveness hinges on four structural levers: currency valuation, energy costs, regulatory burden, and tax rates. Devalue the pound, build 56 nuclear plants, slash red tape, introduce a flat tax — and the country transforms.

Government
Lisbon Solved Its Drug Crisis — Then Forgot Why

“We’re At The Beginning Of A Revolution” - Jimmy Carr - #11… · Aug 10, 2026 Government

Lisbon had one of Europe's worst heroin crises. Then Portugal legalised drugs and redirected all enforcement money into rehabilitation and housing. Crime collapsed. Addiction fell. Then politics moved the money elsewhere, and the problem started creeping back. Chesterton's Fence: you forget why you were spending that money.