Freakonomics Radio

Podbit · Freakonomics Radio

678. Who Gets to Choose a “Good Death”?

Explore episode Jun 19, 2026
Government
Governor Hochul's Mother and the ALS Decision

678. Who Gets to Choose a “Good Death”? · Jun 19, 2026 Government

Kathy Hochul watched her mother deteriorate from ALS for months before dying in 2014, losing her voice, vision, and ability to communicate. That experience was the hidden force behind her decision to sign the Medical Aid in Dying Act — though she insists policy must not be driven by personal experience alone.

Where this was said

Governor Hochul Signs New York's Medical Aid in Dying Act

At 13:02 · chapter starts 12:10

The episode moves from history to the present moment: New York Governor Kathy Hochul has just signed the Medical Aid in Dying Act, set to take effect in August 2025. Dubner walks through the law's specific guardrails — a terminal prognosis of 6 months or less, a mandatory mental health evaluation, an in-person physician visit, a 5-day waiting period after prescription, and a patient-only video or audio request. Hochul speaks in direct, confident terms: she held the veto pen and used it as leverage to force stricter safeguards into the bill before signing. But beneath the political calculation lies profound personal grief. Hochul describes watching her mother deteriorate from ALS — losing her voice, her vision, her ability to communicate — over four to six months before dying in 2014. As a staunch Irish Catholic, Hochul acknowledges the tension with her faith, but says the experience of holding the hands of suffering constituents and hearing their stories made the case morally undeniable. The chapter closes with Hochul characterizing the bill as narrowly tailored, compassionate, and driven by her belief that government should not impose its morality on individuals facing terminal illness.

Similar podbits

Government
The AI Race to Govern Itself: Multi-Stakeholder or Bust

Using AI to Increase Your Intelligence & Enrich Humanity | … · Aug 10, 2026 Government

Fei-Fei Li went back to Stanford from Google in 2018 specifically to build a multi-stakeholder governance framework for AI. Her argument: market forces are not societal norms. Just as biology uses IRBs and cars have safety laws, AI needs layered oversight from educators, governments, and the public — not just a few industry titans.

Government
Surveillance vs. Privacy: The Fulcrum We Need to Find

The Surveillance Economy, and How Capitalism Can Fix Poverty · Aug 10, 2026 Government

Mass surveillance is here to stay. The real battle isn't stopping cameras — it's ensuring judges and laws keep that data out of family court and civil disputes, admitting it only for violent crimes and national security. The surveillance economy currently yields more upside than downside, but only if we build the legal guardrails now.

Government
Northern Europe Isn't Socialist — It's Capitalism Done Right

The Surveillance Economy, and How Capitalism Can Fix Poverty · Aug 10, 2026 Government

When people cite Scandinavia as proof socialism works, Galloway says they've got it backwards. Northern Europe runs highly competitive free-market economies with more competition in many sectors than the US — they just make sure taxes are actually paid and redistributed. Billionaires and universal healthcare can coexist.

Government
How to Fix the UK in Four Moves

“We’re At The Beginning Of A Revolution” - Jimmy Carr - #11… · Aug 10, 2026 Government

Two percent adjustments to income tax and stamp duty tweaks are deck-chair rearrangements. The UK's competitiveness hinges on four structural levers: currency valuation, energy costs, regulatory burden, and tax rates. Devalue the pound, build 56 nuclear plants, slash red tape, introduce a flat tax — and the country transforms.

Government
Lisbon Solved Its Drug Crisis — Then Forgot Why

“We’re At The Beginning Of A Revolution” - Jimmy Carr - #11… · Aug 10, 2026 Government

Lisbon had one of Europe's worst heroin crises. Then Portugal legalised drugs and redirected all enforcement money into rehabilitation and housing. Crime collapsed. Addiction fell. Then politics moved the money elsewhere, and the problem started creeping back. Chesterton's Fence: you forget why you were spending that money.