The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway

Podbit · The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway

America at 250 — with Heather Cox Richardson

Explore episode Jun 18, 2026
Government
Trump Is Political Chernobyl

America at 250 — with Heather Cox Richardson · Jun 18, 2026 Government

Name anyone from Trump's first administration who survived politically — almost no one. Trump is political Chernobyl. The person most likely to win the Republican nomination in 2028 is someone who kept maximum distance. Galloway's best bet: Tucker Carlson.

Where this was said

The GOP's Future: Reformable Party or Crossed Rubicon?

At 50:00 · chapter starts 46:40

Galloway asks Richardson for her prognosis on the Republican Party: has it crossed a Rubicon, or can it reform? Richardson distinguishes between the party name — which MAGA has corrupted — and the underlying principles, which she believes are too deeply embedded in American DNA to die. She notes there are already Republican candidates in the Midwest trying to reclaim the Eisenhower Republican legacy that was read out of the party in the 1990s as RINOs. The real action, though, is on the Democratic side, where she sees a 1850s-style ferment: a multiplicity of candidates, a bubbling-up from below, and a process that will eventually crystallise a new ideology the way Lincoln crystallised the Republican Party in 1857–59. Jon Ossoff is using the old formula. Galloway's contribution is his 'political Chernobyl' thesis: everyone who stayed close to Trump — with the partial exception of Nikki Haley, who still damaged herself by endorsing him — has suffered irreparable political damage. His best bet for 2028 Republican nominee: Tucker Carlson, who has kept careful distance. Richardson adds Liz Cheney as a dark horse — invisible by design, potentially able to enter the race as someone untainted by the Trump years, in the mould of James Buchanan's absence from the 1850s fray.

Similar podbits

Government
The AI Race to Govern Itself: Multi-Stakeholder or Bust

Using AI to Increase Your Intelligence & Enrich Humanity | … · Aug 10, 2026 Government

Fei-Fei Li went back to Stanford from Google in 2018 specifically to build a multi-stakeholder governance framework for AI. Her argument: market forces are not societal norms. Just as biology uses IRBs and cars have safety laws, AI needs layered oversight from educators, governments, and the public — not just a few industry titans.

Government
Surveillance vs. Privacy: The Fulcrum We Need to Find

The Surveillance Economy, and How Capitalism Can Fix Poverty · Aug 10, 2026 Government

Mass surveillance is here to stay. The real battle isn't stopping cameras — it's ensuring judges and laws keep that data out of family court and civil disputes, admitting it only for violent crimes and national security. The surveillance economy currently yields more upside than downside, but only if we build the legal guardrails now.

Government
Northern Europe Isn't Socialist — It's Capitalism Done Right

The Surveillance Economy, and How Capitalism Can Fix Poverty · Aug 10, 2026 Government

When people cite Scandinavia as proof socialism works, Galloway says they've got it backwards. Northern Europe runs highly competitive free-market economies with more competition in many sectors than the US — they just make sure taxes are actually paid and redistributed. Billionaires and universal healthcare can coexist.

Government
How to Fix the UK in Four Moves

“We’re At The Beginning Of A Revolution” - Jimmy Carr - #11… · Aug 10, 2026 Government

Two percent adjustments to income tax and stamp duty tweaks are deck-chair rearrangements. The UK's competitiveness hinges on four structural levers: currency valuation, energy costs, regulatory burden, and tax rates. Devalue the pound, build 56 nuclear plants, slash red tape, introduce a flat tax — and the country transforms.

Government
Lisbon Solved Its Drug Crisis — Then Forgot Why

“We’re At The Beginning Of A Revolution” - Jimmy Carr - #11… · Aug 10, 2026 Government

Lisbon had one of Europe's worst heroin crises. Then Portugal legalised drugs and redirected all enforcement money into rehabilitation and housing. Crime collapsed. Addiction fell. Then politics moved the money elsewhere, and the problem started creeping back. Chesterton's Fence: you forget why you were spending that money.