Jon Mallia Podcast

Podbit · Jon Mallia Podcast

IS-SISTEMA ELETTORALI #1

Explore episode May 27, 2026
Government
Why Nobody Understands STV — And Why That Suits Politicians

IS-SISTEMA ELETTORALI #1 · May 27, 2026 Government

The name 'Single Transferable Vote' is borrowed from academic terminology, and most Maltese citizens have no idea how it works. David Grech argues this is not accidental: parties benefit from a voter base that doesn't understand transfers, quotas, or how their lower preferences flow. An informed electorate would vote strategically; an uninformed one votes emotionally.

Where this was said

Voter Turnout, Eligible Population and What the Percentages Hide

At 25:50 · chapter starts 23:20

David Grech reframes the entire discussion by introducing the voting-eligible population as the correct denominator for evaluating democratic mandates. He notes that Boris Johnson's celebrated 2019 majority was built on just 29.3% of UK eligible voters, and that even Barack Obama — arguably the most popular US president of recent decades — won with roughly 29% of the eligible population. The implication is clear: headline percentages of votes cast are misleading because they ignore abstentions. He then applies the same lens to Malta: Labour's 55.1% of votes cast sounds like a commanding majority, but once you account for non-voters it represents a smaller share of Maltese society than the number suggests. Jon and David also discuss Luxembourg and Belgium, where compulsory voting inflates turnout figures but roughly 60% of compelled voters in Luxembourg still submit blank or spoilt ballots — revealing the limits of mandatory participation as a solution to disengagement.

Similar podbits

Government
The AI Race to Govern Itself: Multi-Stakeholder or Bust

Using AI to Increase Your Intelligence & Enrich Humanity | … · Aug 10, 2026 Government

Fei-Fei Li went back to Stanford from Google in 2018 specifically to build a multi-stakeholder governance framework for AI. Her argument: market forces are not societal norms. Just as biology uses IRBs and cars have safety laws, AI needs layered oversight from educators, governments, and the public — not just a few industry titans.

Government
Surveillance vs. Privacy: The Fulcrum We Need to Find

The Surveillance Economy, and How Capitalism Can Fix Poverty · Aug 10, 2026 Government

Mass surveillance is here to stay. The real battle isn't stopping cameras — it's ensuring judges and laws keep that data out of family court and civil disputes, admitting it only for violent crimes and national security. The surveillance economy currently yields more upside than downside, but only if we build the legal guardrails now.

Government
Northern Europe Isn't Socialist — It's Capitalism Done Right

The Surveillance Economy, and How Capitalism Can Fix Poverty · Aug 10, 2026 Government

When people cite Scandinavia as proof socialism works, Galloway says they've got it backwards. Northern Europe runs highly competitive free-market economies with more competition in many sectors than the US — they just make sure taxes are actually paid and redistributed. Billionaires and universal healthcare can coexist.

Government
How to Fix the UK in Four Moves

“We’re At The Beginning Of A Revolution” - Jimmy Carr - #11… · Aug 10, 2026 Government

Two percent adjustments to income tax and stamp duty tweaks are deck-chair rearrangements. The UK's competitiveness hinges on four structural levers: currency valuation, energy costs, regulatory burden, and tax rates. Devalue the pound, build 56 nuclear plants, slash red tape, introduce a flat tax — and the country transforms.

Government
Lisbon Solved Its Drug Crisis — Then Forgot Why

“We’re At The Beginning Of A Revolution” - Jimmy Carr - #11… · Aug 10, 2026 Government

Lisbon had one of Europe's worst heroin crises. Then Portugal legalised drugs and redirected all enforcement money into rehabilitation and housing. Crime collapsed. Addiction fell. Then politics moved the money elsewhere, and the problem started creeping back. Chesterton's Fence: you forget why you were spending that money.