Quote · This Week in Tech (Audio)
TWiT 1090: Flock of SQLs - Apple & Microsoft Grapple With Soaring Hardware Prices
Where this was said
AI Regulation Debate: Innovation vs. Government Control
At 39:18 · chapter starts 33:35
This is the episode's most philosophically dense segment, with all four participants grappling with AI regulation from different angles. Leo Laporte presents Dean Ball's economic argument: frontier models must recoup the bulk of their enormous training costs in the first months post-release, before competition erodes margins. A government review process that takes even a few weeks could kill a model commercially. More provocatively, Leo argues the Fable block is the functional equivalent of the U.S. banning its own cars to benefit Chinese automakers — the very opposite of the protectionist logic applied to every other industry. Dan Patterson probes whether the whole debate is actually about consumer-facing AI rather than the industrial AI used at companies like Blackbird. Jennifer Pattison Tuohy makes the structural point that government is always two years behind the technology, making effective regulation nearly impossible, and advocates for a global solution rather than unilateral national action. Daniel Rubino suggests the better analogy may be guns — readily available technology that other countries have chosen to regulate more strictly. The panel ultimately agrees that no good mechanism currently exists to evaluate AI safety in a way that is technically credible, politically neutral, and fast enough to matter.
Anthropic's Fable model is estimated to have approximately 10 trillion parameters, likely costing hundreds of billions of dollars to create.
