Where this was said
'Pervert Glasses': Surveillance, Consent, and the Privacy Catastrophe
At 37:05 · chapter starts 34:10
Having established why the glasses look good, the hosts turn to what they actually do — and the picture is alarming. The glasses are, at their core, a wearable camera with audio recording and live-streaming capability. The privacy indicator light that Meta includes can be covered up for roughly $100. Two Harvard students demonstrated in 2024 — in an experiment they called iX-ray — that by combining the glasses with publicly available facial recognition software and open databases, they could identify strangers on the street and surface their names, addresses, and phone numbers within seconds [2] — Richard Osman "Harvard students identified strangers in real time using Ray-Ban Meta glasses: Two Harvard students in 2024 demonstrated that by combining …" 37:50 . That alarm briefly spread across the internet and then dispersed. The glasses kept selling. Meta, as Richard stresses, is above all a data company, and the privacy assurances it offers sit alongside a track record of comprehensively failing to honour equivalent promises about previous products. Marina coins 'pervert glasses' [1] — Richard Osman "Meta's Ray-Ban glasses can film, live-stream, and — combined with facial recognition — identify strangers on the street in seconds. The pri…" 37:00 as the summary term — pointing to pickup artists, people filming in shops without consent, and the specific danger for anyone who has fled an abusive relationship and whose workplace might suddenly be identifiable to millions. Richard observes that every video captured through these glasses also feeds back into Meta's AI training pipeline, meaning users are paying to be unwilling research assistants for one of the world's most valuable companies.
Meta's Ray-Ban smart glasses have grown from roughly one million units sold per year to an estimated three million per year, indicating genuine consumer traction before Kylie Jenner's campaign.
Meta's Ray-Ban glasses can film, live-stream, and — combined with facial recognition — identify strangers on the street in seconds. The privacy indicator light can be covered for $100. Kylie Jenner makes them look desirable, but the law is miles behind, and the consequences will be borne by everyone except Meta.
Two Harvard students in 2024 demonstrated that by combining Ray-Ban Meta glasses with facial recognition software and public databases, they could identify strangers on the street and surface names, addresses, and phone numbers within seconds.
In 2024, two Harvard students combined Ray-Ban Meta glasses with facial recognition software and public databases and identified strangers on the street — surfacing their names, addresses and phone numbers within seconds. The experiment went viral as 'iX-ray'. Then the alarm dispersed. The glasses kept selling.
Meta's smart glasses feature a small recording indicator light intended to signal when they are filming, but this light can trivially be covered up, rendering the safeguard ineffective.
Michael Barrymore, once Britain's biggest light entertainment star before a scandal ended his career, now has 4.4 million TikTok followers — nearly three times Nigel Farage's count — by posting everyday footage of himself chatting to people in shops. He earns an estimated £250,000 a year. But shop workers union Usdaw drew the line when no one had signed a release form.
