82% of 100-baggers fell 50%+
A Worldly Partners study found that 82% of stocks that returned 100x or more since 1972 lost more than 50% of their market value at some point along the way.
Snapshot · Excess Returns
The 100 Year Thinkers: Chris Mayer on SpaceX, AI Reckoning, and Why Early Is Overrated
Explore episode
Jun 27, 2026
Where this was said
Why even a perfect stock picker would face brutal drawdowns
At 48:10 · chapter starts 47:02
The Worldly Partners study: 82% of 100-baggers fell 50%+, with a 65% average drawdown and 8-year waits between highs. Wes Gray's 'God portfolio' proves even perfect picks get punished. [1] — Chris Mayer "82% of the greatest compounders in history — stocks that returned 100x or more since 1972 — lost more than half their value at some point. …" 47:40 [2] — Chris Mayer "Wes Gray built the hypothetical 'God portfolio' — the perfect stocks over any 5-year period from 1927 to 2016. It still got hit with 35%+ d…" 50:40
82% of 100-Baggers Lost Half Their Value Along the Way
82% of the greatest compounders in history — stocks that returned 100x or more since 1972 — lost more than half their value at some point. Average drawdown: 65%. Average return from starting point: 533x. The price of greatness is volatility.
Average drawdown of 100-baggers: 65%
The same Worldly Partners study found the average maximum drawdown for 100-bagger stocks was 65%, illustrating the brutal volatility required to capture exceptional long-term returns.
100-baggers returned 533x on average
Despite brutal drawdowns, the stocks in the Worldly Partners study that became 100-baggers returned 533 times from their starting point on average.
8 years between highs for 100-baggers
The Worldly Partners study found that 100-bagger stocks went an average of 8 years between setting new all-time highs, requiring extraordinary patience from investors.
Even God Would Get Fired as a Fund Manager
Wes Gray built the hypothetical 'God portfolio' — the perfect stocks over any 5-year period from 1927 to 2016. It still got hit with 35%+ drawdowns repeatedly. Any client would have fired God. The problem is never the stocks; it's the investor.
Even God's portfolio: 35%+ drawdowns
A study by Wes Gray (also associated with Michael Mauboussin) showed that a hypothetical 'God portfolio' — the objectively best stocks over any 5-year period — still suffered drawdowns of 35% or more, enough to get any manager fired.
Similar snapshots
$14K/month in 6 months
Sam built Algrow from zero to $14,000 in monthly revenue within just six months of shipping his first MVP.
10,000 users in 6 months
Algrow reached over 10,000 users in roughly six months, driven almost entirely by organic Discord community growth.
First 400 users from Discord
Sam acquired his first 400 users entirely through Discord communities, without paid advertising or traditional outreach.
480 new customers in one month
Algrow added exactly 480 new paying customers in its most recent month, demonstrating strong ongoing growth.
£10K revenue in last 4 weeks
Sam's Stripe dashboard showed over £10,000 in revenue in the last four weeks, equivalent to roughly $13,000–$14,000 USD.
Free access for early users as growth hack
Sam gave all early users free access so they could show the tool to friends, turning them into live demos and advocates who helped the product spread virally.
No self-promo rule exploit: screen sharing
By silently screen-sharing his tool in Discord voice chats rather than posting links, Sam attracted curiosity without violating no-self-promo server rules.
$10K+ from affiliate marketing first
Before building Algrow, Sam and two friends made over $10,000 in revenue through affiliate marketing for RizzApp by posting faceless texting story content.
$13K MRR with $0 marketing spend
Bhanu grew SiteGPT to $13,000 monthly recurring revenue entirely through organic channels, spending nothing on paid marketing.
