Snapshot · The a16z Show
Under the CLARITY Act, lockup periods for venture capitalists and founders investing in crypto tokens would increase significantly compared to the current unregulated environment.
Where this was said
At 49:00 · chapter starts 46:40
Hackett surfaces the final major objection: that the bill would create a loophole where companies tokenize assets to escape securities law entirely. Chris Dixon walks through the mechanics of the bill's actual framework. Tokenizing a stock keeps it a security regulated by the SEC — full stop. The only differentiation is for native crypto tokens: when a new blockchain token launches, it's centralized (someone controls it, has inside information), and the Clarity Act subjects it to SEC oversight. Over time, if the token decentralizes enough — like Bitcoin or Ethereum today, where no single actor has control or inside information — it transitions to CFTC oversight as a commodity, regulated under commodity laws that prevent cornering markets and other manipulation. Critically, this bipartite framework isn't new: even the prior administration's SEC had acknowledged that Bitcoin and Ethereum were sufficiently decentralized to be regulated as commodities. Court cases from both parties over a decade have implied this same structure. The Clarity Act simply hard-codes what has already been implicit consensus — so entrepreneurs and investors don't have to go to court to find out where they stand. Dixon adds a note of self-interest disclosure: the bill will actually increase a16z's lockup periods significantly, because tokens must meet decentralization thresholds before the restrictions lift — which is exactly how it should work.
The CLARITY Act doesn't exempt tokens from securities law — it creates a spectrum. New, centralized tokens are regulated by the SEC. When a token decentralizes enough — like Bitcoin or Ethereum today — it transitions to CFTC oversight as a commodity. Every token has a federal regulator at every point.
The prior administration didn't regulate crypto — it prosecuted it, while offshore operators ran free. Marc Andreessen names this governing philosophy: anarcho-tyranny. Regulate the law-abiding to death while letting the rule-breakers go nuts. It's the worst of both worlds.
Sam built Algrow from zero to $14,000 in monthly revenue within just six months of shipping his first MVP.
Algrow reached over 10,000 users in roughly six months, driven almost entirely by organic Discord community growth.
Sam acquired his first 400 users entirely through Discord communities, without paid advertising or traditional outreach.
Algrow added exactly 480 new paying customers in its most recent month, demonstrating strong ongoing growth.
Sam's Stripe dashboard showed over £10,000 in revenue in the last four weeks, equivalent to roughly $13,000–$14,000 USD.
Sam gave all early users free access so they could show the tool to friends, turning them into live demos and advocates who helped the product spread virally.
By silently screen-sharing his tool in Discord voice chats rather than posting links, Sam attracted curiosity without violating no-self-promo server rules.
Before building Algrow, Sam and two friends made over $10,000 in revenue through affiliate marketing for RizzApp by posting faceless texting story content.
Bhanu grew SiteGPT to $13,000 monthly recurring revenue entirely through organic channels, spending nothing on paid marketing.
We use essential and analytics cookies to run Vuci. To understand how the site is used: Privacy Policy.
Install Vuci on your phone
Add it to your home screen for a faster, app-like experience.
Install Vuci on your phone
Tap the Share button, then “Add to Home Screen”.
A new version is available
Reload to get the latest Vuci.