SOLVED with Mark Manson

Snapshot · SOLVED with Mark Manson

Self-Help, Solved

Explore episode Apr 1, 2026
Science
2,603 studies reviewed

Self-Help, Solved · Apr 1, 2026

The episode's rankings were informed by at least reviewing (and often reading) 2,603 studies across 19 self-improvement techniques.

Where this was said

Introduction: The Self-Help Ranking Project

At 2:37 · chapter starts 0:00

Mark sets the scene with characteristic candor: the self-help space is drowning in contradictory advice, and the only way to cut through it is to actually look at the science. He and co-host Drew Birnie reveal that the episode is built on a review of 2,603 studies — not all read in full, but at least the abstract of roughly half, with quality vetting throughout. The ranking system they developed has three axes: the quantity and quality of research on each technique, the percentage of studies that found a positive effect, and the effect size — how much does it actually work? The 19 techniques span everything from affirmations to microdosing, and they'll be sorted into four tiers: legitimately works, works sometimes, probably nothing, and outright bullshit. Mark flags that some results genuinely surprised him.

Science
The Ranking System: How We Judged 19 Self-Help Techniques

Self-Help, Solved · Apr 1, 2026 Science

Mark and Drew explain the three-axis scoring system behind their meta-review of 2,603 studies: research quality, percentage of studies supporting the technique, and effect size. This framework separates techniques that work consistently but weakly from those that work strongly but rarely.

Similar snapshots