Freakonomics Radio

Snapshot · Freakonomics Radio

679. Why Does Vanderbilt Keep Winning?

Explore episode Jun 26, 2026

Where this was said

The Endowment Tax Fight and NIH Funding Battles

At 10:26 · chapter starts 8:25

This chapter is the most policy-dense section of the interview. Diermeier describes spending considerable time in Washington — alone and alongside other university presidents — fighting a House Ways and Means Committee proposal for a 22% endowment tax. His argument: endowments are accumulated philanthropy, so taxing them means taxing philanthropic intent, with direct consequences for financial aid and research. The lobbying succeeded in reducing bands from four to two and capping the rate at 8%. Diermeier then pivots to NIH: despite fears, appropriations actually increased by about $300 million, reflecting genuine bipartisan support for research. But the operational problem is speed — personnel shortages at NIH are creating approval bottlenecks that Vanderbilt can bridge in the short term, but that will cause material damage if they persist. He notes Vanderbilt has made no layoffs, which distinguishes it from many peers facing severe financial strain.

Similar snapshots