Objective similarity measures — the kind dating apps use to match people — predict whether two people will click at barely better than coin-flip odds.
Snapshot · Huberman Lab
Objective similarity measures — the kind dating apps use to match people — predict whether two people will click at barely better than coin-flip odds.
Where this was said
At 2:05:34 · chapter starts 2:03:50
Huberman reveals that Instagram is reportedly the world's largest dating app by a wide margin — a fact that recontextualizes the infidelity risk of social media entirely. Eastwick then lays out two simultaneous processes at work in committed relationships: the derogation of alternatives (happy partners rate attractive others as 'weak sauce') and the 'playing with fire' of seemingly innocent messaging that escalates. [1] — Paul Eastwick "When you're in a happy relationship, your brain downgrades alternative partners — you see them as less desirable than anyone else would. It…" 2:06:40 He also cites recent studies showing that attraction to an alternative can rebound and increase desire for one's actual partner — the data behind Esther Perel's framework. The key distinction, Eastwick argues, is between the fact of attraction (unavoidable, not dangerous) and the repeated follow-through on that attraction (what actually erodes the protective mechanism and creates infidelity risk). He adds a practical note: couples can benefit from acknowledging the reality of attraction without acting on it — a form of healthy compartmentalization.
According to an expert source cited by Andrew Huberman, Instagram is effectively the world's largest dating app by an enormous margin, with much of its time spent in DMs that lead to real-world meetings.
Take every measurable trait two people have in common, run the math, and your ability to predict whether they'll click is barely better than random chance. Dating app compatibility algorithms are built on a premise that the science doesn't support.
When you're in a happy relationship, your brain downgrades alternative partners — you see them as less desirable than anyone else would. It's not delusion; it's a built-in protective mechanism. And it's why the marketplace metaphor for attraction ultimately breaks down.
The danger in infidelity isn't the initial moment of attraction — it's the repeated follow-through. Each subsequent conversation with someone you're attracted to erodes the protective mechanism that keeps your partner at the center of your desires. Instagram made this process frictionless.
Recent studies show that when people in relationships experience attraction to someone else, desire can boomerang back and increase feelings for their actual partner. Esther Perel has described this dynamic for years. Now it has data behind it.
Dan Gilbert's research found that the psychological immune system — the brain's ability to justify and find satisfaction in choices — activates most powerfully when a decision is perceived as irreversible.
Barry Schwartz's research found that maximizers — people who try to optimize every decision — tend to achieve objectively better outcomes but report lower happiness than satisficers who choose 'good enough.'
Research consistently shows that while people may initially regret poor decisions, in the long run they regret the decisions they didn't make — inaction — far more than the ones they took.
A study showed that men in committed relationships who briefly viewed 10 attractive women's faces reported a measurable decrease in relationship satisfaction immediately afterward, illustrating evolutionary mismatch with modern media.
Harvard psychologist Dan Gilbert, who previously didn't believe in marriage, immediately proposed to his long-term girlfriend after his own research showed that constraints increase satisfaction with choices.
Animals first sensed light 540 million years ago, triggering an evolutionary acceleration known as the Cambrian explosion within 10 million years.
It is estimated that half of all cortical activity in the human brain is involved in visual function, underscoring vision's central role in intelligence.
Cognitive neuroscience literature shows that by age 6, humans can recognize tens of thousands of different object categories — far more data than early AI systems were trained on.
Only about 3% of FDA-approved drugs have genuinely unclear mechanisms of action, making an unknown mechanism a meaningful early red flag for any compound.
We use essential and analytics cookies to run Vuci. To understand how the site is used: Privacy Policy.
Install Vuci on your phone
Add it to your home screen for a faster, app-like experience.
Install Vuci on your phone
Tap the Share button, then “Add to Home Screen”.
A new version is available
Reload to get the latest Vuci.