Snap's stock fell nearly 10% on Tuesday after the Specs glasses were unveiled, reflecting investor skepticism about the product.
Snapshot · Pivot
Snap's stock fell nearly 10% on Tuesday after the Specs glasses were unveiled, reflecting investor skepticism about the product.
Where this was said
At 53:50 · chapter starts 52:45
Kara opens with the facts: Specs are priced at $2,195 — roughly 10x Meta's Ray-Bans — with 4 hours of battery life, from a company that has never been profitable. She notes that even Evan Spiegel, a conventionally handsome CEO, looked immediately unflattering in them. Scott, who has never liked Snap, calls the launch dead on arrival — making Apple Vision Pro look viable by comparison. The core problem is capital: Meta can burn $60 billion on a failed hardware line without flinching; Snap cannot. Kara reflects on her own hands-on experience with early Specs, describing walking through holographic planets as genuinely beautiful, while acknowledging the physical impossibility of making that experience wearably light. [1] — Scott Galloway "This is the beginning and the end of Snap as an independent company. This thing is dead on arrival. It makes the mixed reality headset from…" 54:42 Scott argues that the only wearable category that has truly worked is AirPods, and that AR is always 'a trip to Griffith Park planetarium' — impressive once, then forgotten. The conversation closes with Scott wondering whether Snap should be sold — to Elon, perhaps, or whoever can afford the premium.
Snap's AR glasses cost $2,195, have 4 hours of battery life, and come from a company that has never turned a profit. Scott says this is the beginning of the end of Snap as an independent company — and calls it worse than Apple Vision Pro. The core social business is solid; the hardware is suicide.
Snap's new AR smart glasses 'Specs' are priced at $2,195 — far above Meta Ray-Bans (~$200) but ~$1,000 below Apple Vision Pro — with only 4 hours of battery life.
Despite strong download numbers, PropGPT could not push past $1,000–$2,000 MRR due to poor product retention.
After their rebuilt app launched, Eyal and Yali hit $30,000 MRR in just 10 weeks.
PropGPT achieves a 48% conversion rate from app download to free trial sign-up.
For every user who downloads PropGPT, Eyal and Yali generate approximately $3.30 in revenue.
Before the rebuild, PropGPT had a 45% download-to-trial rate but only 13% trial-to-paid conversion, revealing a product quality problem.
PropGPT peaked at $40,000 MRR and 2,000 downloads in a single day during the NBA playoffs campaign.
A single viral influencer video with 600,000 views drove PropGPT's ARR from approximately $8K to $38K in about 3 days.
PropGPT runs at roughly 50% profit margins after accounting for marketing, data APIs, hosting, and tooling costs.
PropGPT spends approximately $10,000 per month on influencer marketing.
We use essential and analytics cookies to run Vuci. To understand how the site is used: Privacy Policy.
Install Vuci on your phone
Add it to your home screen for a faster, app-like experience.
Install Vuci on your phone
Tap the Share button, then “Add to Home Screen”.
A new version is available
Reload to get the latest Vuci.