The Bulwark Podcast

Snapshot · The Bulwark Podcast

David French: The Birthright Citizenship Ruling Should've Been 9-0

Explore episode Jun 30, 2026

Where this was said

Cook Ruling: The Fed Gets a Carve-Out

At 19:29 · chapter starts 17:48

French has read Cook twice and is 'kind of where you are' with Miller's layman's read: the Fed gets a carve-out that the FTC and SEC don't, essentially because it's always been there. The majority invokes Hamilton and Madison — getting dealt two aces in Texas Hold'em for any originalist argument — to argue the Fed-like structure would have been recognizable and permissible at the founding. But French finds that argument less than fully persuasive and pushes for intellectual honesty: just own the reliance interests argument. Kavanaugh's concurrence essentially says the quiet part loudly — we cannot introduce uncertainty into world markets. An entire global economic system has been ordered around Fed independence, and that's as strong a reliance interest as exists in law. The Chesterton's Fence principle applies: before tearing down the fence, figure out why it's there. French's critique is that the majority didn't run the same traps it ran in Slaughter — if the Fed has real governmental rulemaking power, which elected official is it accountable to? The opinion doesn't fully answer that. It just says the Fed is different. Own it.

Government
The Fed Is Just Different — And You Have to Own That

David French: The Birthright Citizenship Ruling Should've B… · Jun 30, 2026 Government

The Supreme Court preserved Federal Reserve independence in Cook not through airtight constitutional logic but through 'reliance interests' — an entire global economy is built around the Fed's structure. Kavanaugh's concurrence essentially said: we cannot introduce uncertainty into world markets. That's the real argument, and it's time to own it.

Government
Post-Watergate Reforms Are Mostly Gone Now

David French: The Birthright Citizenship Ruling Should've B… · Jun 30, 2026 Government

The Slaughter ruling didn't just affect agency heads — it gutted the oversight architecture built after Watergate. Inspectors general, independent counsels, the whole structure was built with an expectation of independence that the Court has now withdrawn. A Congress that won't exercise its own power made this much worse.

Similar snapshots