AI hates removing code
Scott Tolinski noted that AI tends to add code rather than remove it, even when prompted to, making bloat and technical debt increasingly difficult to manage.
Snapshot · Syntax - Tasty Web Development Treats
1019: LGTM, Ship It: The AI Code Review Problem
Explore episode
Jul 8, 2026
Where this was said
The Challenges of Code Review in AI Development
At 10:30 · chapter starts 6:24
The question from LGTM Bro hits a raw nerve: an engineering team where individual contributors are merging 60 PRs per release cycle — each spanning 20 to 70 files and thousands of lines of AI-generated code — with little to no meaningful human review. The inevitable results are already appearing: technical debt, recurring bugs, architectural inconsistencies, and a codebase becoming progressively harder to maintain. Wes frames this with two archetypal AI-era team strategies: the 'feature cannon' (ship everything, worry later) versus the more considered approach of using AI's horsepower to finally clear years of accumulated debt. His punchline is blunt: the problems being described are not new, and neither are the solutions. What AI has done is speedrun the same failure modes that previously took six years to manifest — compressing them into months. Scott adds the damning detail that AI actively resists removing code even when instructed to, making the bloat problem self-perpetuating. The hosts don't offer a silver-bullet fix; instead they note that good software engineering principles — tests, linting, shared utilities, meaningful review — are exactly as relevant as they ever were, just more urgent.
60 PRs a Week: The AI Code Review Crisis
One team is merging 60 PRs per developer per week, spanning thousands of lines of AI-generated code with almost no meaningful human review. The result: technical debt, recurring bugs, fragile architecture, and a codebase becoming impossible to maintain.
60 PRs per developer per week
One team reported individual contributors merging 60 PRs per release cycle (one week), spanning 20-70 files and thousands of lines of AI-generated code.
AI Is Speedrunning Software Engineering's Worst Lessons
Every software engineering problem being blamed on AI — duplication, inconsistency, fragile code — has existed for decades. AI didn't create bad practices. It just compresses 6 years of codebase decay into a few months.
AI accelerates tech debt accumulation
Problems that previously took 6 years to manifest — duplicated code, architecture inconsistencies, fragile implementations — are now appearing in months due to AI-generated code velocity.
What 'Local AI' Actually Means
Most people think 'local AI' means the software is on their machine. It doesn't. Tools like OpenCode with DeepSeek still make API calls — to servers in China. True local means the model weights run on your hardware.
Similar snapshots
Ad monetization for games
Ad-based monetization works well for game apps where users spend extended time in-session, as seen with Grid and Wordle.
Ads don't work for tool apps
Tool-focused apps like PuffCount are poor candidates for ad monetization because users don't stay in-session long enough.
Hard paywall is unskippable
A hard paywall is a screen that blocks all app features unless the user pays or starts a free trial — it cannot be dismissed.
Two core monetization models
Mobile apps are primarily monetized through either ads (best for games) or in-app purchases/subscriptions (best for tools).
YouTube beats every other platform
According to the episode, YouTube outperforms every other social platform for building trust and driving SaaS conversions.
Most users came from YouTube
Vasco stated that the majority of his app's user base came directly from his YouTube channel.
Boost My Domain Rating button
SEO Bot features a 'Boost My Domain Rating' button that routes users directly to Listing Bot, an example of in-product cross-selling.
All products connected to AI
The founder's entire product portfolio is AI-related, making it easier to package products attractively for directories.
AI coding viability debate as hook
The founder attached their SaaS demo to the trending debate about whether AI coding is actually good enough to build a full SaaS product.
