A reportedly real statistic suggests judges are more likely to deny parole or give harsher rulings when they haven't eaten yet, and more lenient right after lunch.
Snapshot · Matt and Shane's Secret Podcast
A reportedly real statistic suggests judges are more likely to deny parole or give harsher rulings when they haven't eaten yet, and more lenient right after lunch.
Where this was said
At 47:27 · chapter starts 41:10
Nate's shooting hobby and the price of 5.56 ammo leads to a wide-ranging riff on whether being a cop would actually be chill. Matt's verdict: you'd need serious connections to avoid shift work, because the rotating schedule alone would destroy your sleep. Shane suggests a 10 to 4 slot would be ideal — avoiding both morning hangovers and afternoon misery. The funniest pivot: Matt imagines the specific horror of eating a meatball sandwich and three Starbucks refreshers, only to get an urgent radio call requiring a full sprint after a pipe thief. A boa constrictor, he points out, knows to lie still for four days after eating prey. From there, Nate drops the hungry judge statistic — parole hearings close to lunchtime result in harsher sentences, while post-lunch decisions trend more lenient. [1] — Nate Marshall "Hungry judges give harsher sentences: A reportedly real statistic suggests judges are more likely to deny parole or give harsher rulings wh…" 47:27 The guys run with it, imagining defendants slipping Snickers bars to their honor. The conversation briefly gets crude about female judges and periods, which they themselves clock as going a bit far.
The widely cited ego-depletion model — the idea that willpower is a finite resource that gets depleted — failed to replicate in follow-up studies.
Humans are estimated to have 5,000–7,000 thoughts per day, yet can recall essentially none of them afterward, highlighting why in-the-moment emotional tracking matters.
A large Harvard study found that a wandering mind is an unhappy mind — people report greater happiness when their attention is tethered to the present, even if the task is unpleasant.
A key study finding that we have a 'credit card's worth of plastic' in our bodies was likely skewed because researchers used nitrile gloves that shed plastic particles onto the microplastic detector.
Emotionally sensitive people have a hyperactive amygdala, an underactive prefrontal cortex, and a frayed connection between the two — making emotional regulation structurally harder.
Rejection sensitivity can be observed as early as age 2 or 3, suggesting it has strong developmental and likely genetic roots.
A Yale study found that non-judgmental observation of emotions — without rushing to resolve them — reduces activation in the brain, making it a powerful regulation tool.
Dan Gilbert's research found that the psychological immune system — the brain's ability to justify and find satisfaction in choices — activates most powerfully when a decision is perceived as irreversible.
Barry Schwartz's research found that maximizers — people who try to optimize every decision — tend to achieve objectively better outcomes but report lower happiness than satisficers who choose 'good enough.'
We use essential and analytics cookies to run Vuci. To understand how the site is used: Privacy Policy.
Install Vuci on your phone
Add it to your home screen for a faster, app-like experience.
Install Vuci on your phone
Tap the Share button, then “Add to Home Screen”.
A new version is available
Reload to get the latest Vuci.