Modern Wisdom

Podbit · Modern Wisdom

The New Science Of Female Attraction - Psychology Roundtable - #1133

Explore episode Aug 6, 2026
Science
Why Women Get the Ick (And Men Almost Never Do)

The New Science Of Female Attraction - Psychology Roundtabl… · Aug 6, 2026 Science

Women experience the ick far more than men because the asymmetric reproductive risk makes discernment evolutionarily essential. New research frames the ick through the behavioural immune system and evolved disgust reactions. For men, missing a mating opportunity is the bigger risk; for women, it's mating with the wrong person.

Where this was said

Why Do We Get the Ick?

At 13:13 · chapter starts 13:07

A moment of genuine excitement breaks out when Steve Stewart-Williams reveals his PhD student Louisa Lee is doing the first systematic empirical work on the ick — research that barely existed when she began, and has since been scooped once. The ick is framed not as a social quirk but as a product of evolved disgust: women, being choosier on average, have a stronger visceral selection mechanism that fires when a partner reveals social incompetence or health-relevant cues. Macken Murphy explains the asymmetric logic: men risk missing mating opportunities by being too choosy, while women risk catastrophic mating errors by not being choosy enough. Chris Williamson cites Diana Fleischman's self-reported attraction dips when her husband misses a driving turn or lands a joke badly — a modern analogue of an ancient calibration system.

Similar podbits

Science
Microplastics: Were We Measuring Them Wrong?

“This Is The Culmination Of Everything I Know” - Dr Andrew … · Sep 14, 2026 Science

The widely shared claim that we have a credit card's worth of plastic in our brains may be a massive overestimate. Researchers used nitrile gloves to measure microplastics — and nitrile gloves shed microplastic particles onto the measuring device. A second paper found the original tool used was unreliable, and that we may have far less plastic than reported.

Science
The Door-Keeping Experiment: Our Irrational Addiction to Optionality

Finding Your Life Path, Solved · Sep 2, 2026 Science

In Dan Ariely's door experiment, participants sacrificed the highest-reward door — repeatedly — just to avoid seeing other doors disappear. Even when researchers trained them to use the best door, they kept wasting clicks to maintain options. This is the bias that runs our lives: we'll take a worse outcome to preserve the feeling of optionality.

Science
Dan Gilbert's Psychological Immune System: Why Your Brain Justifies Every Decision

Finding Your Life Path, Solved · Sep 2, 2026 Science

Dan Gilbert discovered that the brain has a 'psychological immune system' — it misremembers, reframes, and rationalizes to keep you satisfied with whatever you chose. The fear before commitment is all about potential regret. But after committing, your brain quietly starts justifying the choice — and the more irreversible the decision, the stronger the effect.

Science
The Placebo Effect Is Not Fake — It Just Belongs to the Story, Not the Drug

#403 ‒ Peptides: separating scientific promise from marketi… · Aug 10, 2026 Science

Peptides come loaded with a powerful narrative: regenerative, subcutaneous, targeted, cutting-edge. That narrative can genuinely move outcomes, especially for pain, energy, and recovery. The RCT's job is to quantify how much additional benefit comes from the molecule itself — above and beyond the compelling story surrounding it.