Lex Fridman Podcast

Podbit · Lex Fridman Podcast

#483 – Julia Shaw: Criminal Psychology of Murder, Serial Killers, Memory & Sex

Explore episode Oct 14, 2025

Where this was said

Serial killers

At 37:27 · chapter starts 29:23

Shaw recounts how the Robert Pickton case — a Canadian serial killer who killed victims on his farm and allegedly fed them to pigs — first captured her attention as an undergraduate at Simon Fraser University. Her professor, Stephen Hart, was an expert witness on the trial and modeled the 'gallows humor' that made criminal psychology feel like a viable career. The pivot to the psychology of serial killers in general reveals a consistent pattern: profound loneliness undermines 'reality monitoring' — the social checks that keep extreme thinking tethered to shared reality. Without close relationships to challenge distorted thoughts, dark ideation can escalate unchecked. Shaw brings in the parallel to radicalization and psychosis: in all these cases, the absence of a social tether allows extreme worldviews to solidify. The discussion of Jeffrey Dahmer is particularly striking — Shaw expresses genuine sympathy for his desperate (and horrific) attempt to create a permanent companion, calling it a 'sad' manifestation of a desire for connection that, in its core, is universally human. Elizabeth Loftus is mentioned as another expert who has worked on high-profile criminal cases, including Ghislaine Maxwell.

Similar podbits

Science
Microplastics: Were We Measuring Them Wrong?

“This Is The Culmination Of Everything I Know” - Dr Andrew … · Sep 14, 2026 Science

The widely shared claim that we have a credit card's worth of plastic in our brains may be a massive overestimate. Researchers used nitrile gloves to measure microplastics — and nitrile gloves shed microplastic particles onto the measuring device. A second paper found the original tool used was unreliable, and that we may have far less plastic than reported.

Science
The Door-Keeping Experiment: Our Irrational Addiction to Optionality

Finding Your Life Path, Solved · Sep 2, 2026 Science

In Dan Ariely's door experiment, participants sacrificed the highest-reward door — repeatedly — just to avoid seeing other doors disappear. Even when researchers trained them to use the best door, they kept wasting clicks to maintain options. This is the bias that runs our lives: we'll take a worse outcome to preserve the feeling of optionality.

Science
Dan Gilbert's Psychological Immune System: Why Your Brain Justifies Every Decision

Finding Your Life Path, Solved · Sep 2, 2026 Science

Dan Gilbert discovered that the brain has a 'psychological immune system' — it misremembers, reframes, and rationalizes to keep you satisfied with whatever you chose. The fear before commitment is all about potential regret. But after committing, your brain quietly starts justifying the choice — and the more irreversible the decision, the stronger the effect.

Science
The Placebo Effect Is Not Fake — It Just Belongs to the Story, Not the Drug

#403 ‒ Peptides: separating scientific promise from marketi… · Aug 10, 2026 Science

Peptides come loaded with a powerful narrative: regenerative, subcutaneous, targeted, cutting-edge. That narrative can genuinely move outcomes, especially for pain, energy, and recovery. The RCT's job is to quantify how much additional benefit comes from the molecule itself — above and beyond the compelling story surrounding it.