Kara Swisher gave a speech at a DC naturalization ceremony attended by roughly 100 new citizens from dozens of countries. She teared up. The contrast with the administration's anti-immigrant crusade could not be more stark.
Podbit · The Rest Is Politics: US
Kara Swisher gave a speech at a DC naturalization ceremony attended by roughly 100 new citizens from dozens of countries. She teared up. The contrast with the administration's anti-immigrant crusade could not be more stark.
Where this was said
At 39:15 · chapter starts 38:40
Swisher reserves her sharpest words for Stephen Miller, whom she calls one of two people she finds 'particularly heinous' in this era (the other being Alito) [1] — Kara Swisher "Kara Swisher drew a direct line between Stephen Miller and the bureaucrat who engineered Japanese-American internment — both powered by sin…" 38:15 . She draws an explicit comparison to the midlevel bureaucrat — largely forgotten to history — who was the driving force behind Japanese-American internment during World War II, exploiting an 'addled' superior to enact a policy of mass cruelty without legal justification. She recommends Rachel Maddow's Burn Order podcast for listeners who want to understand the archetype. Then the tone shifts. Swisher describes being invited to give a speech at a naturalization ceremony in DC — roughly 100 new citizens from dozens of countries, a judge's courtroom, families watching their relatives become American. She teared up. She brought her six-year-old daughter. She found the record of her own grandfather arriving from Italy, under a different name. The pride of those families, she says, was the most moving thing she has experienced in a long time — and the starkest possible rebuke to the politics being discussed throughout the episode.
Most people confuse things they value instrumentally (because they get them other things) with things they value intrinsically (for their own sake). Greenberg's friend stayed in a miserable relationship for years because she was living by her parents' values, not her own — the values map made the mismatch instantly visible.
Jungian analyst James Hollis distills a good life to four things: shut up (have gratitude, stop whining), suit up (prepare yourself to fulfill a role), show up (do the actual work in service of others), and daily get out of stimulus-response to ask what your deeper wish actually is. The whole landscape of self-help slots into just these four bins.
Toward the end of their 20s, many men discover that all the strategies that earned them recognition and success have stopped working. It's a second adolescence — more important than the first — where the question shifts from 'how do I play the game?' to 'who do I actually want to become?' Most people going through it look fragile from the outside. They're actually building a foundation.
Boys are told from childhood not to cry, not to feel, not to be weak — but anger gets a pass. The result: a generation of men who reroute every emotion, including sadness and fear, through the only acceptable channel. Emotional avoidance isn't toughness, it's misdirected sensitivity.
Men need a 'bank account' of masculine status — muscle, money, success — before society grants them permission to express vulnerability. Chris Bumstead can cry at the Olympia and get celebrated. A struggling nobody doing the same thing gets contempt. This creates a tragic paradox where the men who most need emotional support get the least of it.
Emotional sensitivity isn't a defect — it's a high-resolution scanner for human experience. Highly sensitive people pick up body language, tone, and unspoken tension that others miss entirely. In the right environment, that's not a liability. It's a superpower.
Her supervisor told her she was too emotional for the pediatric ICU. So she asked herself: 'What area of medicine can I cry in?' That question led her to psychiatry. Finding the environment that holds your emotional sensitivity isn't retreat — it's strategy.
For someone with RSD, ghosting isn't ambiguity — it's a self-verdict. Their brain doesn't read 'this relationship ended,' it reads 'I am the reason this failed.' No closure means the brain fills the gap with evidence of personal insufficiency, and it keeps filling indefinitely.
More freedom doesn't produce more happiness — it produces more anxiety. Kierkegaard identified this 180 years ago: the more options you have, the more you feel the 'dizziness of freedom,' a paralytic unease at having to choose any single one. The freest generation in history is, by his prediction, exactly the most anxious.
We use essential and analytics cookies to run Vuci. To understand how the site is used: Privacy Policy.
Install Vuci on your phone
Add it to your home screen for a faster, app-like experience.
Install Vuci on your phone
Tap the Share button, then “Add to Home Screen”.
A new version is available
Reload to get the latest Vuci.