Snapshot · Freakonomics Radio
President Trump's financial disclosure forms reportedly show $1.4 billion in crypto profits, raising concerns about conflicts of interest in crypto policy-making.
Where this was said
At 57:27 · chapter starts 57:00
Gensler doesn't call it a grift, but he doesn't have to. He cites Trump's publicly disclosed financial forms showing $1.4 billion in crypto profits and notes, quietly, that there is always someone on the other side of those trades. He argues that regardless of whether any specific trade constitutes illegal insider trading, the perception of self-dealing — the president personally enriched by crypto while signing crypto legislation — is deeply corrosive to public trust in democratic governance. He expands the argument: members of Congress and their staffs should not be allowed to trade individual stocks, and the ban should extend to all three branches plus prediction markets. He notes Goldman Sachs has already barred its staff from trading prediction markets, except sports. The legal line is blurry — meeting with corporate executives might create material nonpublic information even without any intent to trade on it — but the solution is simple: just prohibit the trading.
President Trump's disclosed $1.4 billion in crypto profits while simultaneously signing legislation favorable to the crypto industry. Gensler says this undermines public trust in governance at the worst possible moment.
The academic argument that insider trading makes prediction markets more efficient ignores a massive cost: the erosion of public trust. Gensler says lower trust raises the cost of capital for everyone.
A total of 8 states have filed lawsuits against social media platforms, including an ongoing case in Tennessee, using product liability and public nuisance theories to seek accountability.
France built 56 nuclear plants in the 1970s and now has the cheapest energy in Europe, making it independent of Russian or Middle Eastern energy geopolitics.
Estonia has a single tax form, a law preventing the government from asking citizens for the same information twice, and a flat rate of tax — enabling competitive taxation.
Portugal's Lisbon, once a city with a major heroin problem, legalised drugs and redirected enforcement spending into rehabilitation and housing, dramatically reducing crime.
The first Boland Amendment banning CIA and Defense Department funds for the Contras passed the House unanimously — yet the Reagan administration ignored it.
Over just two years, Saudi Arabia alone donated $32 million to the Contra rebels, giving loosely affiliated factions millions they had no way to spend on arms.
The National Endowment for the Preservation of Liberty raised $6.3 million for the Contras but only $3.3 million reached them — a shockingly low 52% program expense rate.
Richard Secord and Albert Hakim marked up their arms shipments to the Contras by as much as 300%, making enormous personal profits from the covert operation.
Lieutenant Colonel Oliver North, tapped to run the entire covert Contra support operation, had no prior experience in covert operations whatsoever — he was learning as he went.
We use essential and analytics cookies to run Vuci. To understand how the site is used: Privacy Policy.
Install Vuci on your phone
Add it to your home screen for a faster, app-like experience.
Install Vuci on your phone
Tap the Share button, then “Add to Home Screen”.
A new version is available
Reload to get the latest Vuci.