Research consistently shows that while people may initially regret poor decisions, in the long run they regret the decisions they didn't make — inaction — far more than the ones they took.
Where this was said
At 2:33:53 · chapter starts 2:28:28
Mark came to Kierkegaard late — after Subtle Art was published — through a philosophy book club in New York. He started Fear and Trembling expecting tedious biblical commentary and emerged converted. [1] — Mark Manson "The ethical stage is rational commitment — you can explain your choices. The religious stage is when your commitment exceeds rational justi…" 3:10:33 The Abraham and Isaac story in Kierkegaard's telling is not about obedience to an insecure God. It's a meditation on the 'virtue of the absurd' — Abraham's willingness to do something utterly irrational and unexplainable to anyone else as a test of the deepest possible commitment. Kierkegaard chose the religious stage's name because only religious language captures what this level of commitment feels like from the inside: it requires a leap of faith, and it involves what he called 'infinite resignation' — the acceptance that it may fail completely, and choosing to do it anyway. The ethical stage is rational commitment, still subject to cost-benefit scrutiny. The religious stage is when commitment merges with identity so completely that it no longer registers as a choice. It just feels like who you are.
The psychological immune system can get you through the first few months of any commitment. But durable, long-term well-being requires self-concordance — choosing commitments that are genuinely aligned with your values and what you actually want. Without that alignment, the satisfaction fades fast.
Every major commitment kills a version of yourself that will never exist. The 25-year-old nomad, the musician, the person who could have gone a different way — those selves die when you choose. Nobody markets change as grief, but that grief is real, and skipping it is why so many people avoid committing. If the grief is genuine, it means you chose something real.
The music conservatory Mark Manson attended had a dropout rate of approximately 87–90%, illustrating how few people reach the 'religious' stage of commitment to a creative calling.
The ethical stage is rational commitment — you can explain your choices. The religious stage is when your commitment exceeds rational justification. You can't explain why. It just feels like it chose you. Kierkegaard called this the 'virtue of the absurd' — and it's represented not just in faith but in the entrepreneurs, artists, and athletes who can't imagine doing anything else.
Steven Pressfield's insight: don't wait for the commitment to feel real before acting like a professional. Set up the studio. Make the schedule. Show up. Commitment doesn't precede action — it follows it. You act like a pro first, and your brain catches up with justifications after. The action is the commitment.
The widely cited ego-depletion model — the idea that willpower is a finite resource that gets depleted — failed to replicate in follow-up studies.
Humans are estimated to have 5,000–7,000 thoughts per day, yet can recall essentially none of them afterward, highlighting why in-the-moment emotional tracking matters.
A large Harvard study found that a wandering mind is an unhappy mind — people report greater happiness when their attention is tethered to the present, even if the task is unpleasant.
A key study finding that we have a 'credit card's worth of plastic' in our bodies was likely skewed because researchers used nitrile gloves that shed plastic particles onto the microplastic detector.
Emotionally sensitive people have a hyperactive amygdala, an underactive prefrontal cortex, and a frayed connection between the two — making emotional regulation structurally harder.
Rejection sensitivity can be observed as early as age 2 or 3, suggesting it has strong developmental and likely genetic roots.
A Yale study found that non-judgmental observation of emotions — without rushing to resolve them — reduces activation in the brain, making it a powerful regulation tool.
Dan Gilbert's research found that the psychological immune system — the brain's ability to justify and find satisfaction in choices — activates most powerfully when a decision is perceived as irreversible.
Barry Schwartz's research found that maximizers — people who try to optimize every decision — tend to achieve objectively better outcomes but report lower happiness than satisficers who choose 'good enough.'
We use essential and analytics cookies to run Vuci. To understand how the site is used: Privacy Policy.
Install Vuci on your phone
Add it to your home screen for a faster, app-like experience.
Install Vuci on your phone
Tap the Share button, then “Add to Home Screen”.
A new version is available
Reload to get the latest Vuci.