Being brown in the West means living with surveillance, torn allegiances, and mistrust — the exact texture of a spy thriller. That feeling is the emotional engine behind Bait, and why James Bond served as the perfect genre vehicle to explore it.
Where this was said
At 4:25 · chapter starts 2:53
Mendoza sets up Bait as a show about an actor of colour trying to break out of stereotype, with Bond as the vehicle. Ahmed immediately complicates the premise: James Bond came late in the writing process, he says, and the show is fundamentally about self-love and how all of us perform a public version of ourselves — on social media, on stage, anywhere we're being watched. He gestures at his own borrowed clothes and jokes that he's reading from an autocue, embodying the very gap the show explores. Then comes the pivot that reframes everything: Ahmed invokes Jordan Peele's observation that being Black in America feels like a horror movie. For Ahmed, being brown in the West feels like being stuck in a spy thriller you never signed up for — surveilled, suspected, caught between allegiances. Bond, then, does double duty: symbol of aspiration and nod to a genre Ahmed desperately wanted to inhabit. [1] — Riz Ahmed "Being brown in the West feels like you're stuck in a spy thriller that you did not ask to be in." 04:42
Bait is a six-episode Amazon Prime series in which Ahmed plays Shah Latif, an actor who auditions to be the next James Bond, exploring themes of self-love, identity, and authenticity.
James Bond came late to the Bait writers' room, but he arrived as the perfect symbol. The show is really about self-love and how people chase validation in all the wrong places — and what better emblem of decisive, desirable, alpha-male aspiration than 007?
Riz Ahmed says being brown in the West feels like being stuck in a spy thriller you didn't ask for — surveillance, torn allegiances, mistrust — which became the emotional core of Bait.
Social media feeds men and women the absolute worst caricatures of each other while stripping away the everyday, imperfect relationships that would calibrate their expectations. Combine that with smaller families and fewer cross-sex friendships, and you get a generation that talks about the opposite sex constantly but almost never to them.
The 'would you rather be alone with a man or a bear' debate went viral not because men are objectively more dangerous than ever, but because an entire fear industrial complex of influencers and safety products had already primed women to feel that way. Once the algorithm identifies you as worried about personal safety, the content and the scrunchie drink-covers never stop.
Women feel less safe not because danger has increased, but because trust in institutions — police, churches, schools — that used to enforce safety norms has collapsed. Young women are far less likely than older women to believe those institutions will handle sexual assault responsibly, leaving them with only individual self-protection as a fallback.
Even self-identified feminist women consistently told Daniel Cox in interviews and surveys that they want men to open doors, pay for dates, and show demonstrable care. The internet noise around 'benevolent sexism' drowns out this widespread, quietly held preference.
In focus groups in Philadelphia and Raleigh, every single hand went up when participants were asked if parents discussed financial stability and education. Zero hands went up for marriage or parenthood. Parents are shaping their children's ambitions with total silence on the experiences that matter most.
American families are smaller than ever, with roughly 1 in 5 children now growing up as only children. Without the daily friction of siblings — shared bedrooms, shared bathrooms, resolving disagreements — young people enter adult relationships without the negotiation muscles relationships require.
Online dating optimises for your existing preferences rather than expanding your horizons. People who meet online give bad first dates almost no second chances; people who meet through mutual friends are far more forgiving. The disembodied, checklist-driven nature of apps removes all the social cues that actually reveal character.
A split-sample survey found that men judge male and female cheating identically harshly, and women judge male cheating the same way men do. The outlier: young women are dramatically less likely to call female infidelity morally wrong, suggesting shared-fate thinking and personal experience of being cheated on are reshaping the moral calculus.
The monk mode trend encourages men to withdraw from social life to work on themselves — but this is precisely backwards. The research is clear: close friendships are the single most powerful predictor of whether a man dates, commits, and becomes his best self. Self-improvement without social reintegration is just sophisticated avoidance.
We use essential and analytics cookies to run Vuci. To understand how the site is used: Privacy Policy.
Install Vuci on your phone
Add it to your home screen for a faster, app-like experience.
Install Vuci on your phone
Tap the Share button, then “Add to Home Screen”.
A new version is available
Reload to get the latest Vuci.