An estimated 2 million people per year take the MBTI in a corporate setting, despite it lacking scientific validation and failing to reliably predict job performance or relationship outcomes.
An estimated 2 million people per year take the MBTI in a corporate setting, despite it lacking scientific validation and failing to reliably predict job performance or relationship outcomes.
Where this was said
At 56:35 · chapter starts 46:00
Mark traces the MBTI's unlikely origin story: Katherine Briggs obsessively translated Carl Jung's work for American audiences, then her daughter Isabel — a novelist without a psychology degree — saw an opportunity when women flooded the WWII workforce and needed rapid job-fit assessment. She built a test from her dining room table, combining Jung's two 'attitudes' and four 'functions' with a fourth spectrum she essentially invented (perceiving vs. judging). Zero peer review, zero control group. The test spread virally through government agencies, then corporate consultants, until by the 1980s 89 of the top 100 global companies administered it. Today 2 million people per year take it in corporate settings. Drew then lists the scientific indictments: 33–50% get different results weeks later; it uses binary categories on what are actually spectra; it doesn't measure neuroticism; and unlike the Big Five, it cannot reliably predict job performance, relationship satisfaction, or mental health outcomes.
A third to half of MBTI takers get a different result just weeks later. It has no measure of neuroticism — arguably the most predictive trait for mental health. It cannot reliably predict job performance, relationship satisfaction, or any major life outcome. The Big Five does all of this consistently. The MBTI survives purely because it flatters and labels us, not because it works.
Between a third and half of people who retake the MBTI just weeks later get a different personality type, revealing it as unreliable and closer to a coin flip than a valid test.
After SpaceX's third rocket failure, Elon Musk estimated survival odds at only 5–10%, yet stated no failure probability would have caused him to walk away — a textbook example of religious-stage commitment.
Sam built Algrow from zero to $14,000 in monthly revenue within just six months of shipping his first MVP.
Algrow reached over 10,000 users in roughly six months, driven almost entirely by organic Discord community growth.
Sam acquired his first 400 users entirely through Discord communities, without paid advertising or traditional outreach.
Algrow added exactly 480 new paying customers in its most recent month, demonstrating strong ongoing growth.
Sam's Stripe dashboard showed over £10,000 in revenue in the last four weeks, equivalent to roughly $13,000–$14,000 USD.
Sam gave all early users free access so they could show the tool to friends, turning them into live demos and advocates who helped the product spread virally.
By silently screen-sharing his tool in Discord voice chats rather than posting links, Sam attracted curiosity without violating no-self-promo server rules.
Before building Algrow, Sam and two friends made over $10,000 in revenue through affiliate marketing for RizzApp by posting faceless texting story content.
We use essential and analytics cookies to run Vuci. To understand how the site is used: Privacy Policy.
Install Vuci on your phone
Add it to your home screen for a faster, app-like experience.
Install Vuci on your phone
Tap the Share button, then “Add to Home Screen”.
A new version is available
Reload to get the latest Vuci.