SpaceX shares remained more than 30% below their peak by Friday June 26th, though still above the IPO price.
Snapshot · The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway
SpaceX shares remained more than 30% below their peak by Friday June 26th, though still above the IPO price.
Where this was said
At 2:10 · chapter starts 1:22
Galloway methodically walks through SpaceX's IPO numbers, noting the stock priced at $135, opened at $150, and peaked somewhere between $210 and $230 — implying a $2.8 trillion market cap that briefly made it one of the most valuable companies ever listed. The fall from grace came fast: a single trading day saw $400 billion evaporate, the second-largest one-day market cap wipeout in stock market history [1] — Scott Galloway "SpaceX shed $400 billion in a single trading day — the second-largest one-day market cap wipeout in history. Yet it still trades above its …" 01:22 . By June 26th, shares had settled at $153, with the company's value reduced to about $2 trillion and the stock sitting more than 30% below its peak. Galloway's verdict is calibrated: 'still an enormous success story' because the base was so astronomical. The key contextual point he makes is that the magnitude of dollar losses is a direct function of the magnitude of gains — SpaceX lost $600 billion precisely because it had a $2.5 trillion market cap to begin with. This framing sets up his broader thesis about whether IPO investors and underwriters will grow more cautious.
SpaceX reached a $2.8 trillion market cap after its IPO, making it one of the most valuable companies ever listed.
SpaceX shed $400 billion in a single trading day — the second-largest one-day market cap wipeout in history. Yet it still trades above its $135 IPO price, making it an undeniable success story despite the carnage.
SpaceX shed $400 billion in market cap in a single day, the second largest one-day wipeout in stock market history.
Modern investment banks are engineers, not bankers. They manufacture scarcity around IPOs to guarantee a 20% first-day pop — Galloway predicted SpaceX's pop at 20% and it came in at 21-23%.
Despite months of meticulous preparation, Starter Story's initial launch attracted zero users — a humbling reminder that building alone guarantees nothing.
A single Reddit link post quickly drove 100 visitors to the Starter Story website, igniting the founder's belief in social traffic.
After reformatting content as a native self-post (no direct link spam), the post exploded with hundreds of upvotes and thousands of readers.
By posting again and again with the native-content strategy, the founder's posts repeatedly hit Reddit's front page, reaching millions of readers.
Before Reddit banned his domain, the founder converted his viral traffic into an email list of tens of thousands — a self-owned audience independent of Reddit.
Redditors eventually organized a petition to ban starterstory.com posts, effectively ending the Reddit growth channel — but the email list was already built.
The Reddit attention strategy ultimately served as the foundation for a million-dollar business, proving that free distribution channels can replace paid marketing.
The key tactic was keeping content fully on-platform (no direct link spam), then adding a small link at the post's end for users who wanted more.
With a thriving email list and a self-owned audience, the founder quit his six-figure New York City salary job to go all-in on Starter Story.
We use essential and analytics cookies to run Vuci. To understand how the site is used: Privacy Policy.
Install Vuci on your phone
Add it to your home screen for a faster, app-like experience.
Install Vuci on your phone
Tap the Share button, then “Add to Home Screen”.
A new version is available
Reload to get the latest Vuci.