Resentment feels like a cozy blanket — it lets you avoid vulnerability — but Dr. Alexandra Solomon says forgiveness is the only path to a relationship version 2.0 worth having.
Reimagining Love with Dr. Alexandra Solomon
Resentment feels like a cozy blanket — it lets you avoid vulnerability — but Dr. Alexandra Solomon says forgiveness is the only path to a relationship version 2.0 worth having.
TL;DR
Dr. Alexandra Solomon walks through questions 7–12 of her 12-question framework for couples considering reconciliation after a breakup [1] — Dr. Alexandra Solomon "You cannot recreate version 1.0 of your relationship — that's the version that ended. Dr. Solomon's 12-question framework pushes couples to…" 00:06 . She covers forgiveness as a gradual "dimmer switch" process, managing déjà vu moments without letting resonance become repetition, navigating pace discrepancies at commitment milestones, aligning on core values, communicating with protective family and friends, and celebrating small wins as fuel for growth [2] — Dr. Alexandra Solomon "When version 2.0 echoes version 1.0, that's not a death sentence — it's a test. The key is to not fight the familiar feeling, slow down, an…" 25:55 . The single most actionable takeaway: trust rebuilds not all at once, but through micro-moments of risking vulnerability and experiencing something genuinely different [3] — Dr. Alexandra Solomon "Forgiveness: dimmer switch, not on/off: Dr. Solomon frames forgiveness as a gradual, iterative process rather than a single decision — you …" 18:00 .
Part two of Dr. Alexandra Solomon's two-part series on reconciliation, covering questions 7–12 of her 12-question framework: forgiveness, handling déjà vu moments, pace discrepancies, values alignment, communicating with friends and family, and celebrating small wins.
Dr. Solomon opens with her signature introduction, establishing her credentials as a clinical psychologist, author, and Northwestern University professor before diving into the purpose of this solo episode. She makes a point of reiterating that she is neither for nor against reconciliation — her goal is to provide a rigorous, self-aware framework that helps people make the choice that's truly right for them. She draws the crucial distinction between relationships that end for clear, permanent reasons (where the work is integration and moving forward) and relationships that end because of timing, context, or a ceiling on relational self-awareness — the latter being the territory this series addresses. Most powerfully, she issues an early challenge: the goal is not to return to how things were, because version 1.0 of the relationship is the very version that ended. What's needed is a genuinely new version, built on different foundations.
This is the richest and most psychologically layered chapter of the episode. Dr. Solomon argues that forgiveness cannot be demanded — only offered — and that couples considering reconciliation must have explicit, brave conversations about every resentment they still carry, whether for a single incident or a pattern of behavior. She introduces the idea that self-forgiveness is as essential as forgiving the other person: acknowledging your own part in the relational dance — even if your part was silence — is both honest and necessary. She then delivers one of the episode's most memorable insights: resentment feels like a cozy blanket, a familiar and protective shield that eliminates the need for vulnerability. [1] — Dr. Alexandra Solomon "Resentment is psychologically seductive because it eliminates vulnerability. But bringing old resentments into a new relationship doesn't p…" 16:00 But carrying that resentment into a new relationship will exhaust both partners and corrode trust, ease, joy, and intimacy. Dr. Solomon invokes the Shawshank Redemption's 'get busy living or get busy dying' to land the point. She closes the section with a neuroscience grounding: citing Dr. Rick Hanson, she explains that our brains are Velcro for the negative and Teflon for the positive, meaning we must be actively intentional about registering safety and change. [2] — Dr. Alexandra Solomon "Negativity bias: Velcro for negative, Teflon for positive: Citing Dr. Rick Hanson, Dr. Solomon notes that our brains are hardwired to stick…" 18:35
Using Ruth and Tony as a teaching vehicle, Dr. Solomon walks listeners through the mechanics of the pursuer-distancer cycle with clinical precision and emotional depth. Tony, experiencing depression and without a role model for seeking help, shut down; Ruth, who grew up in a home where her emotional needs were dismissed with 'look at all your privileges,' responded by escalating her pleas until they became criticism. Round and round they went until Ruth ended it. During their six months apart, Tony began therapy and joined a men's group — meaningful growth, but growth Ruth struggled to trust because it only happened after she turned the volume all the way up. [1] — Dr. Alexandra Solomon "The more Ruth criticized, the more Tony withdrew — and the more Tony withdrew, the more Ruth criticized. This pursuer-distancer cycle is on…" 19:15 Dr. Solomon then uses their story to map out the four dimensions of forgiveness work required: Ruth forgiving herself for tolerating invisibility, Tony forgiving himself for shutting her out, Ruth forgiving Tony, and Tony forgiving Ruth for the harsh things she said when she was desperate. She traces each person's behavior back to a family-of-origin wound, showing how self-compassion deepens when it is rooted in understanding rather than self-blame.
This chapter addresses what is perhaps the most frightening moment in any reconciliation: the déjà vu flash of 'uh-oh, here we go again.' Dr. Solomon's core message is disarmingly direct — the first step is not to fight it. [1] — Dr. Alexandra Solomon "When version 2.0 echoes version 1.0, that's not a death sentence — it's a test. The key is to not fight the familiar feeling, slow down, an…" 25:55 Echoing Byron Katie, she reminds listeners that arguing with reality always loses. Of course there will be echoes; you are still, in some ways, yourselves. The real work is in how you handle the familiar moment differently this time. She introduces the concept of the Alternative Adaptive Sequence from Integrative Systemic Therapy: the moment when a dynamic that could have gone the old way goes a new way instead. Her prescription is to deliberately savor and name those moments aloud, training the brain to notice the new pattern rather than defaulting to the old one. She returns to Ruth and Tony: Tony began proactively volunteering therapy updates to Ruth — not to earn approval, but because he'd genuinely internalized what transparency in partnership looks like. That shift from compliance to authentic care is the kind of corrective moment Dr. Solomon wants every reconciling couple to watch for.
Dr. Solomon pauses before question 9 to remind listeners that all 12 questions are available in a downloadable companion worksheet. Newsletter subscribers receive it automatically; others can access it at dralexandrasolomon.com/secondchances. It's a brief but practical interlude that signals the worksheet is a central resource for the self-reflection work the episode demands.
Pace discrepancy — when partners are not equally ready for the next commitment step — is common in any relationship, but reconciliation adds a layer of disorientation. The milestones you're approaching (exclusivity, meeting each other's families again, having sex, traveling together) have already been passed once. This creates what Dr. Solomon calls a 'both/and': new and not new, a first and not a first. [1] — Dr. Alexandra Solomon "When you're reconciling, you're hitting milestones you've already passed — exclusivity, meeting family, moving in. That 'firsts that aren't…" 33:05 Her advice is deceptively simple: slow down and stay curious. Resist the rush to get back to 'where we were,' because this version of the relationship needs to look different, and crossing a previously-reached milestone doesn't mean the anxiety disappears. She warns against using a prior milestone as a mirage — a point at which you tell yourself you can finally relax — because that defers both presence and genuine ease. Instead, she encourages couples to celebrate micro-commitments along the way: a good dinner with friends, solving a problem together, doing something even slightly differently than before. Progress, however small, is worth naming.
This chapter reframes the entire reconciliation endeavor through the lens of values rather than outcomes. Dr. Solomon credits Dr. Yael Schonbrunn with the goal-versus-value distinction: a 5-mile hike is a goal; whether you approach it with speed, intimacy, or solitude is a value. Applied to reconciliation, the goal shifts from 'get back together' to 'determine whether reconciliation is feasible, wise, and in everyone's best interest.' [1] — Dr. Alexandra Solomon "Goals vs. values distinction (Dr. Yael Schonbrunn): A goal is what you want to do; a value is how you want to feel as you pursue that goal …" 36:30 The values — honesty, safety, freedom, respect, curiosity, humility — are what guide each micro-decision along the way. Dr. Solomon offers a set of possible mission statements couples might adopt: 'I want my partner to feel free, not obliged, to choose this relationship again.' 'I am committed to gentleness no matter what.' These aren't slogans — they're compasses. She notes that partners' values need not be identical, but they cannot be diametrically opposed, and finding at least one shared value (like trust) provides an anchor to return to when the process gets hard.
The question of what to tell friends and family is one of the most practically thorny aspects of reconciliation, and Dr. Solomon handles it with characteristic depth. First, she makes a counterintuitive case for transparency: secret relationships are supercharged by the thrill of being transgressive, and that excitement can be mistaken for genuine romantic momentum. [1] — Dr. Alexandra Solomon "Reconciling in secret risks mistaking the thrill of being sneaky for genuine romantic excitement. Having even a small group of allies keeps…" 39:55 Keeping even a small circle of allies in the loop grounds the reconciliation in reality rather than fantasy. Second, she acknowledges what most people overlook — your friends and family went through the breakup too. They may have formed strong narratives about who was the victim and who was the villain, and they may feel fiercely protective now that you're considering going back. Dr. Solomon's prescription is compassion — for your people's protective instincts — combined with clear, calm communication about the care you're taking. And crucially: stop trying to sell them. The more you advocate for your ex, the more your friends may dig in. Let your ex bear witness to their hurt and ask for forgiveness directly. It may even be necessary for your ex to have that conversation without you present.
Healing in reconciliation is curvy, not linear, and Dr. Solomon's final question asks couples to stop and notice what is actually going right. [1] — Dr. Alexandra Solomon "Every time reconciling partners relate with more curiosity and patience, they create a corrective emotional experience. Noticing and savori…" 44:55 This is not toxic positivity or willful blindness — it's a neurological corrective to the negativity bias. Every time partners meet a difficult moment with curiosity instead of defensiveness, they create what therapists call a corrective emotional experience: receiving or offering something now that was unavailable before. Dr. Solomon is also honest about the emotional trap that waits in these wins — the urge to say 'If you could do this now, why couldn't you have just done it before?' That impulse is real, understandable, and ultimately corrosive. Instead, she offers a model of language that holds both gratitude and grief: 'Thank you for giving me now what you couldn't give me then. There's a small part of me that grieves what I couldn't have then, but a lot of me is glad to have it now.' That both/and — gratitude alongside sorrow, pride alongside vulnerability — is perhaps the most honest summation of what reconciliation truly demands.
In a warm and efficient closing, Dr. Solomon thanks listeners for joining both parts of the series and reiterates where to find the companion worksheet — in their newsletter inbox or at dralexandrasolomon.com/secondchances. She previews a return to guest conversations the following week and closes with her social handles: Instagram at @dr.alexandra.solomon and her website dralexandrasolomon.com, which hosts her blog and the Intimate Relationships 101 e-course based on her Northwestern University class. It's a brief, gracious outro that points listeners toward the broader ecosystem of her work.
Chapter 1 · 00:00
Dr. Solomon opens with her signature introduction, establishing her credentials as a clinical psychologist, author, and Northwestern University professor before diving into the purpose of this solo episode. She makes a point of reiterating that she is neither for nor against reconciliation — her goal is to provide a rigorous, self-aware framework that helps people make the choice that's truly right for them. She draws the crucial distinction between relationships that end for clear, permanent reasons (where the work is integration and moving forward) and relationships that end because of timing, context, or a ceiling on relational self-awareness — the latter being the territory this series addresses. Most powerfully, she issues an early challenge: the goal is not to return to how things were, because version 1.0 of the relationship is the very version that ended. What's needed is a genuinely new version, built on different foundations.
You cannot recreate version 1.0 of your relationship — that's the version that ended. Dr. Solomon's 12-question framework pushes couples to build something genuinely different, using self-reflection and honest conversation as the scaffolding.
Dr. Solomon emphasizes that returning to how the relationship used to be is both impossible and undesirable — what's needed is a fundamentally new version.
Chapter 2 · 04:50
This is the richest and most psychologically layered chapter of the episode. Dr. Solomon argues that forgiveness cannot be demanded — only offered — and that couples considering reconciliation must have explicit, brave conversations about every resentment they still carry, whether for a single incident or a pattern of behavior. She introduces the idea that self-forgiveness is as essential as forgiving the other person: acknowledging your own part in the relational dance — even if your part was silence — is both honest and necessary. She then delivers one of the episode's most memorable insights: resentment feels like a cozy blanket, a familiar and protective shield that eliminates the need for vulnerability. [1] — Dr. Alexandra Solomon "Resentment is psychologically seductive because it eliminates vulnerability. But bringing old resentments into a new relationship doesn't p…" 16:00 But carrying that resentment into a new relationship will exhaust both partners and corrode trust, ease, joy, and intimacy. Dr. Solomon invokes the Shawshank Redemption's 'get busy living or get busy dying' to land the point. She closes the section with a neuroscience grounding: citing Dr. Rick Hanson, she explains that our brains are Velcro for the negative and Teflon for the positive, meaning we must be actively intentional about registering safety and change. [2] — Dr. Alexandra Solomon "Negativity bias: Velcro for negative, Teflon for positive: Citing Dr. Rick Hanson, Dr. Solomon notes that our brains are hardwired to stick…" 18:35
Forgiveness isn't a switch you flip — it's a dimmer you gradually turn up. Dr. Solomon walks through the explicit conversations couples need to have about resentments, self-forgiveness, and taking responsibility for their part of the dance.
Resentment is psychologically seductive because it eliminates vulnerability. But bringing old resentments into a new relationship doesn't protect you — it exhausts you and kills intimacy.
Trust can be destroyed in an instant but is rebuilt through small, repeated moments of vulnerability that result in a safer experience.
Dr. Solomon frames forgiveness as a gradual, iterative process rather than a single decision — you don't have to forgive all at once.
Citing Dr. Rick Hanson, Dr. Solomon notes that our brains are hardwired to stick to negative experiences and let positive ones slide, making conscious savoring essential in reconciliation.
Chapter 3 · 19:15
Using Ruth and Tony as a teaching vehicle, Dr. Solomon walks listeners through the mechanics of the pursuer-distancer cycle with clinical precision and emotional depth. Tony, experiencing depression and without a role model for seeking help, shut down; Ruth, who grew up in a home where her emotional needs were dismissed with 'look at all your privileges,' responded by escalating her pleas until they became criticism. Round and round they went until Ruth ended it. During their six months apart, Tony began therapy and joined a men's group — meaningful growth, but growth Ruth struggled to trust because it only happened after she turned the volume all the way up. [1] — Dr. Alexandra Solomon "The more Ruth criticized, the more Tony withdrew — and the more Tony withdrew, the more Ruth criticized. This pursuer-distancer cycle is on…" 19:15 Dr. Solomon then uses their story to map out the four dimensions of forgiveness work required: Ruth forgiving herself for tolerating invisibility, Tony forgiving himself for shutting her out, Ruth forgiving Tony, and Tony forgiving Ruth for the harsh things she said when she was desperate. She traces each person's behavior back to a family-of-origin wound, showing how self-compassion deepens when it is rooted in understanding rather than self-blame.
The more Ruth criticized, the more Tony withdrew — and the more Tony withdrew, the more Ruth criticized. This pursuer-distancer cycle is one of the most destructive patterns in intimate partnership, fueled here by Tony's unaddressed depression and Ruth's childhood wounds around being ignored.
The more one partner pursues (criticizes, cajoles), the more the other distances, creating a destructive loop that drove the fictional couple Ruth and Tony apart.
Self-forgiveness deepens when you connect your relationship behavior to a core wound from your childhood. Tony's inability to listen to Ruth tracked back to watching his father dismiss his mother; Ruth's tolerance for being ignored tracked back to emotionally unavailable parents who told her to count her blessings.
Forgiveness of self is deepened when a person connects their relationship behavior to a core wound from their family of origin.
Chapter 4 · 25:55
This chapter addresses what is perhaps the most frightening moment in any reconciliation: the déjà vu flash of 'uh-oh, here we go again.' Dr. Solomon's core message is disarmingly direct — the first step is not to fight it. [1] — Dr. Alexandra Solomon "When version 2.0 echoes version 1.0, that's not a death sentence — it's a test. The key is to not fight the familiar feeling, slow down, an…" 25:55 Echoing Byron Katie, she reminds listeners that arguing with reality always loses. Of course there will be echoes; you are still, in some ways, yourselves. The real work is in how you handle the familiar moment differently this time. She introduces the concept of the Alternative Adaptive Sequence from Integrative Systemic Therapy: the moment when a dynamic that could have gone the old way goes a new way instead. Her prescription is to deliberately savor and name those moments aloud, training the brain to notice the new pattern rather than defaulting to the old one. She returns to Ruth and Tony: Tony began proactively volunteering therapy updates to Ruth — not to earn approval, but because he'd genuinely internalized what transparency in partnership looks like. That shift from compliance to authentic care is the kind of corrective moment Dr. Solomon wants every reconciling couple to watch for.
When version 2.0 echoes version 1.0, that's not a death sentence — it's a test. The key is to not fight the familiar feeling, slow down, and then consciously capture the moments when the old pattern does NOT happen.
A familiar moment in a new relationship does not have to become the old pattern — if partners meet it with curiosity and humility, it can go differently.
Tony didn't give Ruth updates on his therapy to earn gold stars. He did it because he understood that volunteering your inner world to a partner so they don't have to walk on eggshells is what building intimacy actually looks like.
Dr. Solomon says the odds that both partners will be ready for the exact same commitment milestone at the exact same time are very slim.
Chapter 5 · 33:05
Dr. Solomon pauses before question 9 to remind listeners that all 12 questions are available in a downloadable companion worksheet. Newsletter subscribers receive it automatically; others can access it at dralexandrasolomon.com/secondchances. It's a brief but practical interlude that signals the worksheet is a central resource for the self-reflection work the episode demands.
When you're reconciling, you're hitting milestones you've already passed — exclusivity, meeting family, moving in. That 'firsts that aren't firsts' confusion is real, and the answer is to go slow and resist using a past milestone as a finish line for anxiety.
Chapter 7 · 36:25
This chapter reframes the entire reconciliation endeavor through the lens of values rather than outcomes. Dr. Solomon credits Dr. Yael Schonbrunn with the goal-versus-value distinction: a 5-mile hike is a goal; whether you approach it with speed, intimacy, or solitude is a value. Applied to reconciliation, the goal shifts from 'get back together' to 'determine whether reconciliation is feasible, wise, and in everyone's best interest.' [1] — Dr. Alexandra Solomon "Goals vs. values distinction (Dr. Yael Schonbrunn): A goal is what you want to do; a value is how you want to feel as you pursue that goal …" 36:30 The values — honesty, safety, freedom, respect, curiosity, humility — are what guide each micro-decision along the way. Dr. Solomon offers a set of possible mission statements couples might adopt: 'I want my partner to feel free, not obliged, to choose this relationship again.' 'I am committed to gentleness no matter what.' These aren't slogans — they're compasses. She notes that partners' values need not be identical, but they cannot be diametrically opposed, and finding at least one shared value (like trust) provides an anchor to return to when the process gets hard.
The goal of reconciliation isn't to get back together — it's to decide whether reconciliation is feasible, wise, and in everyone's best interest. And the values guiding that process (honesty, safety, curiosity, humility) are what keep you aligned with the person you want to be.
A goal is what you want to do; a value is how you want to feel as you pursue that goal — a framework Dr. Solomon attributes to Dr. Yael Schonbrunn.
Chapter 8 · 39:55
The question of what to tell friends and family is one of the most practically thorny aspects of reconciliation, and Dr. Solomon handles it with characteristic depth. First, she makes a counterintuitive case for transparency: secret relationships are supercharged by the thrill of being transgressive, and that excitement can be mistaken for genuine romantic momentum. [1] — Dr. Alexandra Solomon "Reconciling in secret risks mistaking the thrill of being sneaky for genuine romantic excitement. Having even a small group of allies keeps…" 39:55 Keeping even a small circle of allies in the loop grounds the reconciliation in reality rather than fantasy. Second, she acknowledges what most people overlook — your friends and family went through the breakup too. They may have formed strong narratives about who was the victim and who was the villain, and they may feel fiercely protective now that you're considering going back. Dr. Solomon's prescription is compassion — for your people's protective instincts — combined with clear, calm communication about the care you're taking. And crucially: stop trying to sell them. The more you advocate for your ex, the more your friends may dig in. Let your ex bear witness to their hurt and ask for forgiveness directly. It may even be necessary for your ex to have that conversation without you present.
Reconciling in secret risks mistaking the thrill of being sneaky for genuine romantic excitement. Having even a small group of allies keeps the relationship grounded in reality — and a robust community takes the pressure off partners to be everything to each other.
Reconciling in secret can conflate the thrill of transgression with genuine romantic excitement, making the relationship unsustainable.
A robust community of friends and family takes the pressure off partners to be everything to each other and provides witnessing during tough times.
When you broke up, your friends and family went through it too. Now that you're reconciling, they may need to forgive your ex before they can welcome them back. The most powerful move isn't selling them on your vision — it's letting your ex ask for forgiveness directly.
Chapter 9 · 44:55
Healing in reconciliation is curvy, not linear, and Dr. Solomon's final question asks couples to stop and notice what is actually going right. [1] — Dr. Alexandra Solomon "Every time reconciling partners relate with more curiosity and patience, they create a corrective emotional experience. Noticing and savori…" 44:55 This is not toxic positivity or willful blindness — it's a neurological corrective to the negativity bias. Every time partners meet a difficult moment with curiosity instead of defensiveness, they create what therapists call a corrective emotional experience: receiving or offering something now that was unavailable before. Dr. Solomon is also honest about the emotional trap that waits in these wins — the urge to say 'If you could do this now, why couldn't you have just done it before?' That impulse is real, understandable, and ultimately corrosive. Instead, she offers a model of language that holds both gratitude and grief: 'Thank you for giving me now what you couldn't give me then. There's a small part of me that grieves what I couldn't have then, but a lot of me is glad to have it now.' That both/and — gratitude alongside sorrow, pride alongside vulnerability — is perhaps the most honest summation of what reconciliation truly demands.
Every time reconciling partners relate with more curiosity and patience, they create a corrective emotional experience. Noticing and savoring these wins isn't toxic positivity — it's the fuel that powers the hard work of building something new.
Each time partners relate with more curiosity and patience, they create a corrective emotional experience — feeling now what they could not feel then.
No indexed bits in this chapter.
Resentment is psychologically seductive because it eliminates vulnerability. But bringing old resentments into a new relationship doesn't protect you — it exhausts you and kills intimacy.
When version 2.0 echoes version 1.0, that's not a death sentence — it's a test. The key is to not fight the familiar feeling, slow down, and then consciously capture the moments when the old pattern does NOT happen.
This episode
Factual claims made this episode, and whether a source was named.
Human brains are hardwired with a negativity bias, clinging to negative experiences (Velcro) while shedding positive ones (Teflon).
Trust can be destroyed in an instant but is rebuilt through small, repeated micro-moments of vulnerability that yield a safer experience.
Intimate partnerships tend to be strongest when embedded in a broader community of friends, family, and other affiliations.
Secret reconciliations are often energized by the thrill of transgression rather than genuine romantic excitement, making them unsustainable.
The chances that both partners will be ready for the same commitment milestone at exactly the same time are very slim.
Forgiveness of self deepens when tied to a core wound from one's family of origin.
Arguing with reality always results in a loss, 100% of the time.
Each time reconciling partners relate with more curiosity and patience, they create a corrective emotional experience.
A goal is what you want to do; a value is how you want to feel as you make progress toward that goal.
Healing in second-chance relationships is more curvy than linear, often feeling like two steps forward and one step back.
Reconciling in a relationship means there will be 'firsts that aren't really firsts,' creating a confusing both/and timeline of new and familiar milestones.
Weddings tend to be community events partly because intimate relationships function as bridges between families and friend groups.
This episode
Fictional character used by Dr. Solomon to illustrate the pursuer role in a pursuer-distancer dynamic during reconciliation.
Fictional character used by Dr. Solomon to illustrate the distancer role; his unaddressed depression and family-of-origin patterns drove the breakup.
Author and speaker quoted by Dr. Solomon: 'When I argue with reality, I lose, but only 100% of the time,' used to encourage acceptance of déjà vu moments.
Neuropsychologist cited by Dr. Solomon for his concept that brains are 'Velcro for the negative and Teflon for the positive.'
Clinician credited by Dr. Solomon for the goals vs. values distinction applied to the reconciliation framework; noted as an upcoming Reimagining Love guest.
Dr. Solomon's academic home, where she teaches and where the Family Institute practices Integrative Systemic Therapy.
Northwestern-affiliated therapy institute whose model — Integrative Systemic Therapy — is the framework Dr. Solomon practices from, including the Alternative Adaptive Sequence concept.
Dr. Alexandra Solomon's podcast, of which this is episode 71, focused on translating relationship psychology into practical tools.
Dr. Solomon's e-course based on her popular Northwestern University class, mentioned in the closing outro.
Film cited by Dr. Solomon for the quote 'Get busy living or get busy dying,' used to illustrate the cost of carrying resentment into a new relationship.
Stats
We use essential and analytics cookies to run Vuci. To understand how the site is used: Privacy Policy.
Install Vuci on your phone
Add it to your home screen for a faster, app-like experience.
Install Vuci on your phone
Tap the Share button, then “Add to Home Screen”.
A new version is available
Reload to get the latest Vuci.