Podbit · Modern Wisdom
We evolved to want more, but we're now drowning in abundance. Since infinite scrolling arrived, boredom has increased, not decreased — and experiments show people enjoy a single randomly assigned video more than one they chose from twenty options. The brain as comparison engine is its own worst enemy.
Where this was said
At 7:47 · chapter starts 3:30
Chris asks why talking about constraints is so unsexy, and Epstein offers an evolutionary explanation that reframes the entire episode's premise: our brains are miscalibrated for modern abundance. We evolved to want more of everything because, in our ancestral environment, excess was nearly impossible — just as with sugar, the craving made sense when the resource was scarce and has become pathological now that it's ubiquitous. This mismatch surfaces clearly in psychological surveys: in an international study cataloguing creativity myths, the number-one false belief held by respondents was that people are most creative when they have maximum freedom [1] — David Epstein "We evolved to want more, but we're now drowning in abundance. Since infinite scrolling arrived, boredom has increased, not decreased — and …" 07:47 . Epstein pairs this with the 100-million-fold increase in consumer options since pre-industrial times — far outpacing the roughly 400-fold rise in wealth — and the counterintuitive finding that since infinite scrolling was introduced, people have become progressively more bored. Experiments bear this out: participants randomly assigned a single video to watch report feeling less bored than those given a free choice of 20 from the same pool. The explanation is that the brain is a comparison engine, and simply knowing other options exist undermines your enjoyment of the present one — a direct conflict with every economic model of rational consumer behaviour.
Consumer options have increased by roughly 100 million fold compared to pre-industrial societies, dwarfing the 400-fold increase in wealth, yet people keep reporting they want even more choice.
Since the introduction of infinite scrolling, people have been getting progressively more bored with entertainment, because the brain's comparison-engine nature means knowing other content exists undermines enjoyment of the current one.
People who try to maximise every decision are less happy, more regret-prone, and no better at actually choosing well. Herbert Simon — who coined 'satisficing,' won the Nobel Prize in Economics, the Turing Award, and the top prize in psychology — proved the point by wearing one beret, eating the same breakfast, and living in the same house for 46 years.
Research shows that people who try to maximize every decision spend more time deciding, are less happy with their choices, are more prone to regret, and are less satisfied with their lives overall.
Most people confuse things they value instrumentally (because they get them other things) with things they value intrinsically (for their own sake). Greenberg's friend stayed in a miserable relationship for years because she was living by her parents' values, not her own — the values map made the mismatch instantly visible.
Jungian analyst James Hollis distills a good life to four things: shut up (have gratitude, stop whining), suit up (prepare yourself to fulfill a role), show up (do the actual work in service of others), and daily get out of stimulus-response to ask what your deeper wish actually is. The whole landscape of self-help slots into just these four bins.
Toward the end of their 20s, many men discover that all the strategies that earned them recognition and success have stopped working. It's a second adolescence — more important than the first — where the question shifts from 'how do I play the game?' to 'who do I actually want to become?' Most people going through it look fragile from the outside. They're actually building a foundation.
Boys are told from childhood not to cry, not to feel, not to be weak — but anger gets a pass. The result: a generation of men who reroute every emotion, including sadness and fear, through the only acceptable channel. Emotional avoidance isn't toughness, it's misdirected sensitivity.
Men need a 'bank account' of masculine status — muscle, money, success — before society grants them permission to express vulnerability. Chris Bumstead can cry at the Olympia and get celebrated. A struggling nobody doing the same thing gets contempt. This creates a tragic paradox where the men who most need emotional support get the least of it.
Emotional sensitivity isn't a defect — it's a high-resolution scanner for human experience. Highly sensitive people pick up body language, tone, and unspoken tension that others miss entirely. In the right environment, that's not a liability. It's a superpower.
Her supervisor told her she was too emotional for the pediatric ICU. So she asked herself: 'What area of medicine can I cry in?' That question led her to psychiatry. Finding the environment that holds your emotional sensitivity isn't retreat — it's strategy.
For someone with RSD, ghosting isn't ambiguity — it's a self-verdict. Their brain doesn't read 'this relationship ended,' it reads 'I am the reason this failed.' No closure means the brain fills the gap with evidence of personal insufficiency, and it keeps filling indefinitely.
More freedom doesn't produce more happiness — it produces more anxiety. Kierkegaard identified this 180 years ago: the more options you have, the more you feel the 'dizziness of freedom,' a paralytic unease at having to choose any single one. The freest generation in history is, by his prediction, exactly the most anxious.
We use essential and analytics cookies to run Vuci. To understand how the site is used: Privacy Policy.
Install Vuci on your phone
Add it to your home screen for a faster, app-like experience.
Install Vuci on your phone
Tap the Share button, then “Add to Home Screen”.
A new version is available
Reload to get the latest Vuci.