Quote · This Week in Tech (Audio)
TWiT 1090: Flock of SQLs - Apple & Microsoft Grapple With Soaring Hardware Prices
Where this was said
Ring, Flock Safety & the Surveillance State Debate
At 1:58:10 · chapter starts 1:57:00
The surveillance segment begins with Ring's Super Bowl ad — ostensibly about finding lost pets using a new AI-powered camera-sharing feature — which featured an image of a neighbourhood with radar-like scanning rings emanating from every house. Viewers immediately read it as a surveillance state advertisement, and the backlash was fierce. The timing was terrible: the ad ran during the height of DHS deportation operations, and reporting from 404 Media revealed that ICE had accessed Flock Safety cameras not through a direct federal partnership but by going through local police departments. Flock Safety maintained they had no federal contracts, but the mechanism was there regardless: local police have those partnerships, and agencies can request access. Jennifer walks through how Ring's partnership with Axon (body cameras) and Flock adds up to a connected surveillance network that Ring's stated policies may not be able to constrain. Daniel Rubino notes the uncomfortable parallel: Americans have been taught that China's ubiquitous camera network represents authoritarian overreach, but private companies partnering with government agencies behind closed doors produces the same functional outcome.
Ring announced facial recognition for its cameras. Flock Safety's nationwide license plate database was allegedly accessed by ICE through local police partnerships. The Super Bowl ad showing radar-like rings emanating from neighborhood cameras triggered mass backlash — because it told the truth about what these systems can do.
